Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Dave Waterman

Dave Waterman
Dave Waterman
  • 0
    Following
  • 11
    Followers
  • 13
    Posts
  • 3
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Dec. 5, 2010
Last Seen
6 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Of course.  Isn't everything about me? 

 

Country
United States of America

Bridge Information

Regular Bridge Partners
Spouse (Terry)
Favorite Tournaments
Vegas
Favorite Conventions
Those which plug a hole, rather than create holes
BBO Username
aguahombre
ACBL Ranking
Sapphire Life Master
Dave & Terry Waterman
2/1 Game Force
Copy to my cards View/Print
Transfers after 1NT - 2C - 2D?
Transfer to and then bidding 2 is a valuable tool for some of us to use for something else.
Technical question: is this 3!h bid forcing
Holding Axx or Kxx, the wrong-siding becomes moot. With Qx (5-3-3) openers would not be right-siding notrump anyway. And there is an upside to 1nt...Opener will rebid 2m with 2-5- (4-2) and I will know it is an actual fit rather than a mere preference which I should remove ...
Technical question: is this 3!h bid forcing
Michal: 3 shouldn't be categorized in 'forcing' or 'non-forcing' terms at all. That is the semantics. But, DB and others has already said that.
Technical question: is this 3!h bid forcing
By inference, 3 DOES limit the hand, both in size and in shape. With as much as 11 HCP and the implied 3-2-4-4 shape, we will stick it back to Opener with a re-cue 3. This is only relevant in case slam is afoot.
Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: AJ8632 --- KT5 KQ98
That would be 2 for me. Really don't want a cheap 2 bid by the guy on my left.
What does a hesitation suggest here?
"In your case, dithering would suggest something important: that your hand offers a choice of continuations." Not likely. More likely just a self-check to ensure that the bid is within our current agreements.
Technical question: is this 3!h bid forcing
"does 1♥ (1♠) 1nt deny both minors ?" Interesting question and leading to an interesting inference. With say 3-2-4-4 and a Spade stop we would choose 1nt with ten or fewer points. But, with both minors and 11-12, we would choose a neg double and hope for a chance to bid ...
What does a hesitation suggest here?
"If you open 1♥ and partner raises to 2♥, you ought never to have to think at that point about whether to invite game or not - you should have thought of that when you opened." When you are recognized as the God you are, and your laws are in place ...
Transfers after 1NT - 2C - 2D?
We use 2M after the 2 response to Stayman as mini Smolen -- five of the other major, inviting game. The fact that we have 4 of the bid major is merely to be inferred by the opponents and Opener because of the Stayman bid itself. Stayman followed by 3m ...
Technical question: is this 3!h bid forcing
With, say, XXX X KQJxxx Qxx, as one example, Responder would x a 1 overcall because she cannot bid 2 and passing would be a crime.
Not following anyone yet
.

Bottom Home Top