Bridge Winners Profile for David Coles
Basic Information
- Member Since
- April 16, 2011
- Last Seen
- 9 hours ago
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
Bridge Information
- Member of Bridge Club(s)
- Tampa Bay Bridge Center
- ACBL Ranking
- Gold Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- Todd Holes's bidding problem: AK3 Q964 QJ8763 ---
- 4NT asking the same thing
- Craig Biddle's bidding problem: KQ JT76532 4 Q83
- Pass. Too many flaws for anything else
- Mark Jones's bidding problem: A87 6 AKQ987 A75
- I like 2♥. If partner raises he should have 5 spades. If not you get more info than you would with a jump to 3♦
- Rodney Lighton's bidding problem: AJ92 QJ9 K4 A865
- How can 4♣ be non-minimum when you slready bid 2 minimum spades?
- The weakness of lower strats
- I was at a game a few months ago where the director was having the usual ns-ew difficulties. He finally announced that if he didn’t get a ns to volunteer to switch, we would play the game with two sitouts. Surprise! A pair volunteered. Brilliant!
- You be the director
- As reference, partner is a notorious weak weak-2er, frequently with 5. We use mod-Ogust to compensate. I probably was too conservative here, but it was a conditioned reflex...lol
- The weakness of lower strats
- Missing the point I think
- The weakness of lower strats
- I’m with Peg...makes my head explode. This is supposed to be a competitive game. Why reward the worst pair in a field. Are we doing participation awards like T-ball? Goes against my grain is all.
- The weakness of lower strats
- My mistake...it was 26.85% http://www.bridgewebs.com/cgi-bin/bwom/bw.cgi?pid=display_rank&sessid=473246215633063&event=20190703_1&club=tampabaybridge
- The weakness of lower strats
- We had a NAP qualifier this week where a 27% got a Q! Wonders never cease...
See all comments
