Bridge Winners Profile for Erik Hansson
Basic Information
- Member Since
- May 17, 2016
- Last Seen
- 6 hours ago
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- about me
Swedish junior
- Country
- Sweden
Bridge Information
- Favorite Bridge Memory
- Winning the youngsters European Championships by 1 imp in 2017
- Bridge Accomplishments
- U21 World Champion 2018 & U21 European Champion 2017
- Regular Bridge Partners
- Castor Mann
- Favorite Tournaments
- The Swedish Bridgefestival
- Favorite Conventions
- Gazilli
- BBO Username
- HansEri1
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- What is this 2NT?
- 2NT = 5+C 3+D (2 card difference in minors) X = 4+C 3+D (1 card difference in minors) With equal m length you always bid 3D
- Nikolay Yaninski's bidding problem: JT2 KQJ875 Q K82
- In my book 5H directly is stronger than 4N+5H
- Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: AT85 KQT432 7 86
- Sidenote: I like to play 4C here as good H raise and 4D as clubs
- 1NT - 2M to play: Alertable?
- This happened with screens. The doubler did not ask about the meaning of 2H and therefore thought he showed hearts. His partner did ask and knew that 2H was natural to play. Consequently X was suppose to be take out of hearts.
- 1NT - 2M to play: Alertable?
- This board happened to our dutch teammates in the u21 pairs. It cost them the bronze medal which they lost by 1 match point. Especially sad since they dominated the qualification stage. So the polish guy doubled 2H "to show hearts" while his partner thought it was take out. They ...
- Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: 73 J9543 KQ984 7
- This is a fit jump to 3H. If you jump to 4D and the opponents bid 4S, what now?
- Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: Q4 AK875 K2 KJ73
- 3S is searching for the best game
- Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: 32 J972 J652 963
- Without a suit there is no bid
- Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: 5 AKQ865 QT7 QJ6
- Seems like partner has 2*H and 3-4*S based on the bidding, since he didn't bid 2S/3H
- Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: 3 AT72 9875 A952
- 3S+4H seems about right. I dont like the 3C bid, what do I do when p bids 3D/3S? I guess it worked out this time... I'd rather show both m's with perhaps 3S?
See all comments
