Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Jack Spear

Jack Spear
Jack Spear
  • 80
    Following
  • 46
    Followers
  • 128
    Posts
  • 39
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
May 3, 2012
Last Seen
17 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

.

Country
United States of America

Bridge Information

Member of Bridge Club(s)
BBO/OKBRIDGE
BBO Username
jspear
ACBL Ranking
Grand Life Master
Jack Spear & Tom Kniest
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Jack Spear & Don Stack
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Chuck Said & Don Stack
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Jack Spear & Steve Stewart
2 over 1 except suit rebid
Copy to my cards View/Print
Tom Kniest & Don Stack
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Copy of JS Strong NT sect 021716
varied NT10-13 1,2 nonV - all other 15-17; 1M-2!c could be 2
Copy to my cards View/Print
Jack Spear & Robert Weaver
Copy to my cards View/Print
ACES & KNAVES World Premiere in Memphis on March 25th at 10 am and 7:30 pm
How about a showing in Las Vegas at the summer nationals?
Jason Feldman's bidding problem: Kxxx x 9xx AJT9x
I am OK with the pass showing game-forcing value, and now 5 should show forward-going value (instead of doubling). With better clubs, I might have bid them over 2.
Pete Marvin's bidding problem: AKT4 AKQ542 J8 Q
1 is a better choice than 2, because the hand does not have the expected strength for 2, and it can be easily described by opening 1 before reversing by bidding 's. If we open 2 and the opponents preempt, we will have lost ...
Richard Fleet's bidding problem: 87632 4 AQ2 KQ73
3NT. Take the money.
Tom Townsend's bidding problem: QJ9642 K53 863 T
One likely time that 2 could be declared by the intervening side is when the bidding goes (1NT)-P-(P)-? After failing in 3 a few times, I finally switched to Meckwell X=either one minor or two majors in the fourth seat only.
Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: AT6 Q542 A853 K3
With 1 denying a balanced hand, 1NT should be forcing, but true it was not stated.
Tom Townsend's bidding problem: QJ9642 K53 863 T
Obvious that partner is most likely to be short in spades, and partner did not have the suit quality for his vulnerable 3 bid on a probable partscore hand. (But a common problem is the inability to play 2 here.)
Tom Townsend's bidding problem: QJ9642 K53 863 T
Pass. Partner disturbs 1NT to bid a minor suit vul on the 3-level? I could lose three spade tricks in a spade contract, but we are not losing three trump tricks here.
Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: AT6 Q542 A853 K3
I bid 1NT to discover if partner has 4+ or jump shift values. If not, 4 will be fine. A jump to 4 might miss a better game in 's, or even a slam if partner jump-shifts in 's. Partner is known to be ...
Stig Holmquist's bidding problem: AKxxxxx x AKxx x
I walk into a local duplicate day game, and see a room filled with people who have over 5 decades of competitive experience. Some minimum high-card-point agreement for opening 2C can lead to more accuracy investigating slam possibilities--the objective of opening 1 here. (And playing Namyats can help achieve ...
.

Bottom Home Top