Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Jack Spear

Jack Spear
Jack Spear
  • 73
  • 43
  • 102
  • 39

Basic Information

Member Since
May 3, 2012
Last Seen
9 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me


United States of America

Bridge Information

Member of Bridge Club(s)
BBO Username
ACBL Ranking
Grand Life Master
Jack Spear & Tom Kniest
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Jack Spear & Don Stack
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Chuck Said & Don Stack
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Jack Spear & Steve Stewart
2 over 1 except suit rebid
Copy to my cards View/Print
Tom Kniest & Don Stack
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Copy of JS Strong NT sect 021716
varied NT10-13 1,2 nonV - all other 15-17; 1M-2!c could be 2
Copy to my cards View/Print
Jack Spear & Robert Weaver
Copy to my cards View/Print
Rohit Gupta's bidding problem: --- QT876 K965 QT92
My partners always bid 2, too :(
John Torrey's bidding problem: AKQ4 A5 A87 AQ65
2NT. With no agreements regarding continuations after a pass, this will avoid any misunderstanding regarding stayman, transfers, or whether I have a diamond stopper. (Try for best result possible vs best possible result?)
Adam Grossack's bidding problem: 4 Q74 73 AJ76532
Pass. Partner could have anything at this vulnerability. But I wonder if we were were vul vs non, perhaps double could be agreed to show a good hand with spade shortness... (like this one with unexpected playing strength on the bidding)
David Parsons's bidding problem: 84 T872 AQ75 QJ9
Yes, bid 4 over 3, then leave the rest up to partner. Double of 3 would only be lead-directional.
Jay Barronen's bidding problem: J86543 Q KQT873 ---
Pass. If the suits were reversed, then 2. The bad suit with bad value is going to keep me out on this one.
Kyle Rockoff's bidding problem: AT63 A985 AQ92 5
2NT. Bidding a major instead implies unsuitability for 2NT rebid, so partner must check back by bidding any 4-card major. (It may be a more popular treatment just to rebid any major instead of 2NT.) But actually prefer an artificial 2 (unless holding 4M with 5) then: 2 ...
WOLD is Senior USA1
Andreas Babsch's bidding problem: --- Q3 T9876 AKQJ54
3. Usually the problem will be reaching 6 when it is right. So I want the option to cuebid the void later and let partner decide.
Brad Craig's bidding problem: Q65 AQT75 4 QT95
2 in the local matchpoint game.
Responses to Drury
I like 3-way Drury (forgot where I came across this): 2=4-card support (2N inquiry) 2=3-card support 8-9 or 10-12 (2 asks) Then 2M=8-9, 2 other M=10-12 (Leaving room for 2N inquiry) So P-1M-2M always 5-7

Bottom Home Top