Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Jarek Wyganowski

Jarek Wyganowski
Jarek Wyganowski
  • 6
  • 2
  • 10
  • 0

Basic Information

Member Since
Oct. 6, 2015
Last Seen
an hour ago
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
ATB: More issues in the slam zone...
Opps didnt give us much room to confidently arrive at slam.
Polish Club: some doubts
Here is the link to Krzysztof Jassem's site, who keeps his Polish Club notes relatively up to date:
Assess the blame (15)
With soft values and crapola hand S should just bid 4 immediately after 3. I think S overbid at least twice, with N being slightly to blame too.
After 1m-1H with a balanced minimum hand?
A matter of agreement. In the weak NT system I play most often, 1 rebid promises 5-4 (or 4144 after 1 opening). In strong NT structure I see it most often being played as any hand with four spades - responder assuming balanced minimum. I think this would be ...
Really bad or not 2?
Probably. But if I bid 4 I can be assured 4 comes next.
Really bad or not 2?
I don't want to hear 4 from the opponents.
How to get to 4!h
Blame the methods you use.
Tommy Cho's bidding problem: AQ7 AJ5 A AJ7642
You need a convention to increase your chances on hands like this. I play 3 as 6+ hand GF.
TD Ruling
If you think appeal without merit, I am there with you.
TD Ruling
Declarer is definietly damaged, as according to explanations from his screenmate, finesse gives him an easy and safe 10 tricks. As to whether E would have played a Q on the first trick - why? Unless EW play 2nd-4th lead, E with suit knows that lead is from singleton ...

Bottom Home Top