Bridge Winners Profile for Jean-Pierre Rocafort
Basic Information
- Member Since
- May 23, 2012
- Last Seen
- 32 minutes ago
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- about me
French bridge player, coach and writer (newspapers, web-site, books); living in Toulouse, working in Meteo-France company, native from Catalonia, born in 1952.
- Country
- France
Bridge Information
- Bridge Accomplishments
- 1996 French Teams 2nd; 2001 French Pairs Champion; 2014 French Senior Teams Champion; 2014 French Cup winner
- Regular Bridge Partners
- michel claret, jean-marie py, catherine barthe
- Member of Bridge Club(s)
- Montauban
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- RHO open 1NT, you have 2524 and 15 points
- If possible, i play a convention which doesn't allow to bid with this hand; so as to be sure neither me nor partner will be tempted to take action in such a situation.
- Which is more likely?
- The mean time of appearance of 6-6 can be calculated from scratch. we will name it A=T(6-6). The same for T(1-1) which will obviously be the same figure A. The same for T(1-2) which will be B. In order to compare A with B, you can ...
- Which is more likely?
- The solution is more obvious if you compare the appearance of 12 compared to 11 (instead of 12 compared to 66). in both problems, the solution must be the same. Starting from the first appearance of 1, you may win with: 12, 112, 1x12 (x is 3,4,5 or ...
- Ethical bidding?
- Absent EI, their score would have been somewhere between 0 and 100%. Following EI they didn't reques, their score will be somewhere between 0 and 60%.
- Ethical bidding?
- I think a TD should never let the board be played in such situations. It's unfair to the player who called TD: either he gets a bad score and he lives with it, or a good score and it will be adjusted as it could have been the result ...
- Help, please. Interesting or humorous deals wanted.
- you might try to pick some stuff here: https://roquibridge.wordpress.com/articles/donnes-marquantes/
- Another ruling case
- I agree this is the right way to proceed. It was N's responsability to make sure E was aware of his alert. TD concluded N failed in this duty; if E had been damaged he would have been entitled to redress; he was not damaged. N was entitled to ...
- Public statement from bridgegod.com and myself
- A sad start for february. Sometimes i feel ashamed to be catalan.
- In the Well: Dennis Bilde
- Do you manage to include physical activities during a long period of bridge competition such as NABC or international tournament? How long do you need as mental conditioning before a bridge session?
- New Bridge Magazine!
- Are Bridge Magazine previous customers automatically registered?
See all comments
Not following anyone yet