Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Jeppe Juhl

Jeppe Juhl
Jeppe Juhl
  • 9
    Following
  • 6
    Followers
  • 8
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Aug. 11, 2015
Last Seen
March 21
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Anti-Doping Violation by Geir Helgemo results in Team Zimmerman disqualification from Orlando Rosenblum Cup
SHAME ON YOU What a disgraceful verdict ... what a travesty! NOT for Geir; but for the people who rigidly applied the anti-doping sanction rules for a drug that has ZERO percent chances of enhancing a bridge players performance. A few minutes of research will explain why this combination of drugs ...
Forcing Pass or not?
You can find a gazillion hands where you would be better off with pass being forcing here and vica versa. BUT ... why on earth complicate matters? A rule stating that: "an initially passed hand cannot make a forcing pass" will make life so much easier for you and partner
Vanderbilt Round of 16 Vugraph matches
Zagorin - Diamond. Who would want to miss a match with Fredin on a team...?
What card would you play now...?
EDIT: My reply to Kit below is wrong. I will, however, not delete it ... I am (EDIT: 'was)' convinced your argument is incorrect. Please enlighten me ... we agree on the following: West has J98 in trump, dummy has 10432, declarer's length is either four or five. It is unclear ...
What card would you play now...?
I am flat out wrong ... :)
What card would you play now...?
Well, you got a good point on this deal about dropping the K from KQ. And yes it is a 'play-the-player-problem'. But...! Under the following two assumptions (only partial met in the hand above)... IF 1) Opponents don't know declarers length (4(5)-4, 5(6)-3, 6(7 ...
What card would you play now...?
1NT
What card would you play now...?
Sorry. 1NT was the opening
Jeppe Juhl's bidding problem: AK92 AK6 QJ53 AK
With 10-11 it is natural to rdbl and support later. That shows exactly xxx in hearts---- so it should probably say without immediate supp. in H
Jeppe Juhl's bidding problem: AK92 AK6 QJ53 AK
Should have been "without fit in hearts" in the description above
.

Bottom Home Top