Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Jim Munday

Jim Munday
Jim Munday
  • 161
  • 99
  • 129
  • 21

Basic Information

Member Since
July 27, 2010
Last Seen
an hour ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Living near Memphis, frequently found on BW or BBO.

Part-time engineering consultant; sports enthusiast, and puzzle maven.

United States of America

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
Making KO round in 1st US Trials experience
Bridge Accomplishments
1st 2013 Fast Pairs, 3rd Platinum Pairs 2015, 2nd 2013/2015 NAP Flt A, King of Bridge 1984,
Regular Bridge Partners
Sue Munday, Larry Sealy, Richard Pavlicek, Richard Oshlag, Alex Kolesnik, Bill Hall
Favorite Tournaments
Favorite Conventions
BBO Username
ACBL Ranking
Grand Life Master
Paul Linxwiler - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Alex Kolesnik - Jim Munday
Copy to my cards View/Print
Mark Bartusek - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Dave Smith - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Richard Oshlag - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Larry Sealy - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Usual Kokish sequemce
So 6N showed 7 keys, the trump Q and a void? If 4N was RKC then why not respond? Of course 4N RKC over 2 Kokish is impossible. Some alerts are carelessly omitted but the 6N calls makes no sense over 4N RKC. Would South have bid the same ...
Plan your play 15.
It's quite easy to visualize the 7th club, as opener. 4 / 3N does not preclude 6N.
Do you spend too much time playing bridge?
Do we spend too much time worrying about if we spend too much time on things?
Michal Czerwonko's bidding problem: KQJ63 754 AJ AKT
Partner lacks a heart stopper or spade tolerance, what game are we making? It's not a dream that partner is 13 in the majors, it's almost a certainty.
Mike Giesler's bidding problem: K732 A852 K43 A5
I prefer swapping 4 and 4 here. Plenty of room for 4 to be effective keycard ask. 4 allows a 4 wriggle from opener, which i can decline. Primes but no spots - coin flip. I'm an optimist (as my partner's will attest).
Rohit Gupta's bidding problem: 73 A42 AKJ54 AJ7
Hoping for 100% ...
Third-Level Reasoning?
I'd say West has the Q and didn't want me to take the safety play in the suit after spades cleared.
Robert Leese's bidding problem: AKQxxxx xx --- KQT9
And if partner's 22 count was missing an ace? 1 does not preclude getting to a grand. I would not be concerned about missing a king looking at this collection.
What is your plan?
Delayed Alert
It was the 'experienced players' clause. Despite the fact that at least 1 of 3 of those polled duplicated my defense (I recall all 3 made the same lead and at least 1 diverted but don't remember which way the 2-1 vote ran). What looked like a natural bid ...

Bottom Home Top