Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Jim Munday

Jim Munday
Jim Munday
  • 178
  • 117
  • 142
  • 21

Basic Information

Member Since
July 27, 2010
Last Seen
28 minutes ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Living near Memphis, frequently found on BW or BBO.

Part-time engineering consultant; sports enthusiast, and puzzle maven.

United States of America

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
Making KO round in 1st US Trials experience
Bridge Accomplishments
1st 2013 Fast Pairs, 3rd Platinum Pairs 2015, 2nd 2013/2015 NAP Flt A, King of Bridge 1984,
Regular Bridge Partners
Sue Munday, Larry Sealy, Richard Pavlicek, Richard Oshlag, Alex Kolesnik, Bill Hall
Favorite Tournaments
Favorite Conventions
BBO Username
ACBL Ranking
Grand Life Master
Paul Linxwiler - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Alex Kolesnik - Jim Munday
Copy to my cards View/Print
Mark Bartusek - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Dave Smith - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Richard Oshlag - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Larry Sealy - Jim Munday
2 over 1
Copy to my cards View/Print
Paul Munafo - Jim Munday
Copy to my cards View/Print
Double vs overcall with South somewhat a stylistic decision. I rarely go with 100% on these but I would force game before passing with the North hand.
I use 3 "keys" as a guide in my non-serious partnerships. A key being defined as trump honor (AKQ), side aces, honors in partners suit (AKQ). I'm certainly at the top of that range, but with 5332 i think it's on target. I was torn between 8 and ...
Kyle Rockoff's bidding problem: --- --- AKQ8732 K97632
Do we really want to play clubs when partner is 2-2, 2-3, or even often 1-3 in the minors? Yes it could work but even 0-4 can break even. Diamonds are trump for me.
Robin Barker's bidding problem: AK4 983 9 QJT853
I play splinter with some fit with others, i make the appropriate bid based on our agreements. Partner likely thinks we have majors, but unless they have explained as such to the opponents, I think it would be AI but I’m going to bid as if we are on ...
Dahl and Oshlag Win Fast Pairs
Back to back congrats.
Canada Needs Shades
One (me) could argue that the inclusion of the x’s implicitly indicates the spots are not relevant. I did not have a hand record, nor did I write the full deal down. Declarer did not hold the T or 9 , I should have put them where they belonged (south ...
Canada Needs Shades
It’s possible but declarer might survive 4-1 clubs by taking the finesse. Hard to imagine hook losing
Canada Needs Shades
He has a cat named Garfield?
Rajan Iyer's bidding problem: KJT54 Q7632 --- KJ2
2 = majors If i don't have a way to show majors, then i get one.
Unusual 2NT
We had a hand in our Vanderbilt match where responder was indeed 0166 and saw partner open 1. The auction didn't continue as posted by the OP but that's the type of hand I would expect.

Bottom Home Top