Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for John Larkin

John Larkin
John Larkin
  • 1
    Following
  • 0
    Followers
  • 2
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Sept. 5, 2016
Last Seen
7 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player

Bridge Information

Member of Bridge Club(s)
GBC Glasgow
ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
What has partner got?
The question is unusual, in that you are simultaneously asked to decide what the bid means with the (separate?) question - what has happened? So.... I suppose one would want to know how long they have been playing puppet. But my actual guess is that this was not behind screens and ...
Gradations of the Lawson Bidding Problem
Why five choices? (He asks, irreleventlishly)
2019 Cavendish Pairs in Monaco
In some European soccer qualifying leagues, if it comes down to goal difference to decide the qualifier, games against "minnows" do not count.
Too stringent with the announcements/alerts?
BM: Wish I'd immediately read your first line. Scanned up through all the posts trying to find KP's previous! Still, worth it to agree with RY. I think "forcing for one round" is quite clear without any further clarification. (I.e. No "only" required.... cf "each member is ...
Too stringent with the announcements/alerts?
Hmmm...
Was this (not) funny enough?
ER's comment flagged as being offensive to us young people.
What do you make of this?
Did West alert and then say it was a transfer to H when asked, or did he volunteer detail?
Insufficient Qbid: Is a Sufficient Qbid Comparable?
It may specify the same denomination of the stopper, or of the stopper-ask.
What is the meaning of demonstrably?
First of all, it is interesting to see that everyone is assuming that the BIT is a hesitation (or I may have missed its being stated somewhere). Once that established, it is then interesting that many point out we have a basic hand that should never (almost never?) bid again ...
Was this (not) funny enough?
To be fair on JH, would you not expect a 5D opening to be pre-emptive and a bit short of 11 tricks? So its "unexpected" meaning should be alerted. If this was just a happened-to-be-at-upper-range, they wouldn't have that agreement. And seems he got grumpy at their being grumpy ...
No followers yet
.

Bottom Home Top