Bridge Winners Profile for Marko Gligorijević
Basic Information
- Member Since
- Sept. 4, 2015
- Last Seen
- June 5
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
Bridge Information
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- Marko Gligorijević's bidding problem: 8632 K4 65 KJT87
- I just have question for anyone who voted for 4♣. Your partner bid some strong hand with 3♠. Same bidding, you hold xxx, xxxx, xxx, xxx. What's your bid now?
- Marko Gligorijević's bidding problem: 8632 K4 65 KJT87
- No. There is need for 3♠ as natural if you think 2♠ is common psych and I stated that in my first comment. Response was unclear...
- Marko Gligorijević's bidding problem: T754 98 AQJ AKJ9
- Can you imagine partner trying to convince you for hours that 1♣ is correct opening?
- Marko Gligorijević's bidding problem: 8632 K4 65 KJT87
- I didn't get your point. So, between ♥ and minor, E bids ♠ suit as sign off. And you bid 3♠ on that as suit you want to play?
- Marko Gligorijević's bidding problem: 8632 K4 65 KJT87
- Maybe, but only to catch those bluffs. If 2♠ is correct bid, it's probably 6 cards
- Probability, probability...
- I agree that RHO is more likely to hold 4 trumps and trump lead sets the contract on actual layout. But I still think it's making playing 8♠ to dummy against 4 trumps on the right.
- Probability, probability...
- I think that's fine analysis and covers pretty much every layout when you can make 7♠. Except the actual one that happened in the game, which is for some reason blind spot to everybody. LHO has 4 trumps and diamonds are 4-2. But it makes in fact, you ...
- Probability, probability...
- Ok, and if both follow spades what next?
- How do you play trumps?
- J109? And no lightner double?
- How do you play trumps?
- How's that better than finessing immediately?
See all comments
