Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Marshall Lewis

Marshall Lewis
Marshall Lewis
  • 20
    Following
  • 18
    Followers
  • 2
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Aug. 16, 2011
Last Seen
8 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Writer
Country
Croatia

Bridge Information

Favorite Tournaments
Pula International Bridge Festival
Favorite Conventions
Takeout Double, Drury, 2-way checkback, druGFree; MOST DISDAINED: Muiderberg, Bergen, Gambling 3N
ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Oren Kriegel's lead problem: T87543 876 5 842
yes, after the recent rule change
Oren Kriegel's lead problem: T87543 876 5 842
Seems unlikely they can take 13 tricks without using diamonds at all
BW 2/1: 100% GF?
I am not sure I follow as this has been worded. If you mean that the absolutely-GF agreement is LESS PRONE TO POTENTIAL ethical problems than one which grants latitude to bail without clearly specifying the exact range of situations where that is allowed, naturally your point is granted. Obviously ...
BW 2/1: 100% GF?
Ambrose -- Leaving aside the allusion to a rhetorical exercise on my part, your "answer" simply begs the question: Why? Also, it goes without saying that any poll, which by its very nature canvases opinions rather than verities, necessarily is inquiring into "what the readership thinks" about X -- rather than "what ...
BW 2/1: 100% GF?
are comments about future political topics ok? :)
BW 2/1: 100% GF?
If they "clearly know" that, why are they polling?
BW 2/1: 100% GF?
I am a big advocate of "Last-Train-To-Partscore" safety nets :)
BW 2/1: 100% GF?
You could of course include that hand-type as poster-child for the range of an opening 2M bid but that would probably not find its way into a system conceived for casual partnerships of a relatively parochial type. Anyway that wouldn't address the same sort of issue in an opening ...
Andreas Babsch's bidding problem: AKQJ9 5 JT76 J86
Tough decision. If partner has a few clubs, we may need to bid now -- he is just going to pass it out in 3C holding the likes of: Txx KQTx Q9x Axx. If partner is short(ish) in their suit Pass might be better, but how well placed would we ...
Oren Kriegel's bidding problem: KT9x Kx JTx Q9xx
OK while we are on the topic of who is more likely to have what, I would like to offer yet another reason for favoring a 1N advance. Bidding spades is mainly eligible to yield a satisfactory result when partner has four of them -- and as noted elsewhere, even if ...
.

Bottom Home Top