Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Maurizio Sacco

Maurizio Sacco
Maurizio Sacco
  • 1
  • 12
  • 0
  • 0

Basic Information

Member Since
Oct. 11, 2015
Last Seen
March 26
Member Type
Bridge Player

Bridge Information

Bridge Accomplishments
Italian Open and Junior Pairs Champion. Twice silver medalist in the Italian Teams Premier League. Twice fourth in the Italian National Teams Cup. Winners of more then twenty National and International events
Regular Bridge Partners
Enrico Castellani
Member of Bridge Club(s)
Pisa, Villa Fabbriche, Breno
Favorite Tournaments
Barcellona International Open Pairs, Hong Kong Intercity, Gambarie National Open Teams and Pairs
BBO Username
ACBL Ranking
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Maurizio Di Sacco interview - topics: LoveBridge (tablet bridge) and cheating
Well, actually this part is subjected to regulations (personally, I'm in favour of it). Tablet can be set either way (allow infractions or not). We will see when the Committee meets (very soon), but I expect general approval.
Maurizio Di Sacco interview - topics: LoveBridge (tablet bridge) and cheating
The good reason for not using cards is not seeing your partner, so taking away a possible source of unauthorised informations and cheating actions. I attended an important event in Budapest, where cards were not used and everybody looked happy. Obviously, the further problem is to whether to play at ...
Possible dumping at 1958 Bermuda Bowl
Since it looks like you bought the book, you can :) BTW: the title is just the translation, word by word, of its original: Il Blue Team nella storia del bridge". What I added to the original book were the notes: nearly 500.
How to lose in a World Championship
It is worth adding to David's comment that the experts are polled also to determine whether there's a relation between the UI and the action under examination. Using the Laws' wording, they're asked whether they believe the action was demonstrably suggested or not. Whether this has been ...
The virdict is not appealable, thus it is final. It will become executive fifteen days after the deposit of the motivations. This ends up the legal proceedings in Europe, other than for possible lawsuits.
Score Adjustment in Berg v Lavazza
Because the fact that the team uses some agreement, is not a proof that a particular pair does the same. It is obvious. A TD cannot rely on that fact. What I find odd, is to have had the misunderstanding.
Score Adjustment in Berg v Lavazza
What you are clearly missing is that NS certainly could not prove their agreement. Otherwise, yes, the decision would not make sense, but I'm not prepared to believe it.
Score Adjustment in Berg v Lavazza
Not just strange: outlaw. That's why cannot be that Bilde-Madala could prove that South was right. Most likely, this is what they tried to argue, but failed to produce a solid evidence.
Score Adjustment in Berg v Lavazza
One more point: since the double was related to the infraction, that was not - or should not have been - what the TDs were investigating. They were, instead, deciding whether the doble could have been considered as a double shot (in which case didn't need to be unrelated to the ...
Score Adjustment in Berg v Lavazza
Very strange. The whole Lavazza team (well, all the Italian experts) play the same, and from at least 20 years. Madala and Bilde had already played a few sets of boards. I'm wondering how's possible Bilde mixed up what should have been simple routine.

Bottom Home Top