Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Michael Kopera

Michael Kopera
Michael Kopera
  • 294
  • 62
  • 109
  • 48

Basic Information

Member Since
July 23, 2010
Last Seen
32 minutes ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Have played professionally occasionally the last few years, would be happy to do so more frequently. I normally play locally (CT, NJ, NYC), but would certainly consider travelling, especially to a Nationals. Send me a Private Message if interested.

United States of America

Bridge Information

Bridge Accomplishments
Making 4SXX after Al Roth overcalled 1S (Barbara doubled, not Al :)
BBO Username
ACBL Ranking
Diamond Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Something unusual ...
Presumably based on:[quote]7. DEFENSE TO: ... b) natural no trump opening bids and overcalls, except that direct calls, other than the following, must have at least one known suit. - Double - Two Clubs - Two Diamonds showing a one suited hand in hearts or spades[/quote]Off-topic, it never occurred to ...
Western Cue if opps bid two suits?
Does that really work in non-1NT auctions?
More VuGraph Coming
I couldn't find a link to the round-robin results, a little sleuthing produced: EditAdd: now I see it, I had been looking under USBF Tournaments, 2107 Senior USBC, apparently should have been looking higher at Event Results, 2017 Senior USBC.
Earlier today I held a one-suited hand. Since this apparently shows a specific suit, please tell me which suit I held. Clue: you're wrong. BTW, I wouldn't classify 1 and 1 as one-suited -- each might be, but doesn't have to be, a second (or even ...
Sci-fi defence? :)
The solution (J) seems to be a play to kill declarer's entry, but if declarer is 3=5=4=1 as the bidding and trick 1 suggest...that would suggest killing the entry to the trick instead.
Is this offensive?
Seems to me anyone interested in the scores would [i]look[/i] at them, wouldn't need partner to tell him (said by someone who likewise never looks at them).
Sci-fi defence? :)
"The ten. 2nd and 4th means low from two, middle from three, fourth from four or more." So based on that, partner's 8 means declarer must have 3?
Is this offensive?
"But what if one was offended and the other wasn't?" Based on another article, I [i]could[/i] go with half-offensive [size=23][color=red]☻
One-suiter vs one-suiter. To me the latter specifies a suit (s), the former doesn't.
Bidding plan?
Natural and partner is not allowed to raise "natural"? Based on other comments, many would prefer the opponents to bid their doubled game.

Bottom Home Top