Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Michael Kopera

Michael Kopera
Michael Kopera
  • 263
    Following
  • 55
    Followers
  • 96
    Posts
  • 48
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
July 23, 2010
Last Seen
28 minutes ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Have played professionally occasionally the last few years, would be happy to do so more frequently. I normally play locally (CT, NJ, NYC), but would certainly consider travelling, especially to a Nationals. Send me a Private Message if interested.

Country
United States of America

Bridge Information

Bridge Accomplishments
Making 4SXX after Al Roth overcalled 1S (Barbara doubled, not Al :)
BBO Username
miko
ACBL Ranking
Diamond Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
An "offbeat incident"
@Gary Hann Meanwhile, there supposedly [i]is[/i] information you say is readily available, information that you claim to have, information that you say you have sent to another person. Why not make it available to all? Why the secrecy on your part?
An "offbeat incident"
I meant "carefully" in the sense of the former, not the latter. Fair Witness fan here.
An "offbeat incident"
"The Ethical Oversight Committee Packet is also readily available, with every bit of relevant information." In the words of Jean-Luc Picard, make it so.
An "offbeat incident"
"There was NO brokered deal between MP and the committee as a whole." That is a carefully worded statement if I've ever heard one. "NO suggestion of this punishment came from the lips of MP or his representative." This sounds like MP and/or his representative were present. I ...
non-serious 3NT convention
"For OP its the 1st sequence that he defined as “The obvious and classic situation in which non-serious 3NT is on is in the sequence :1♠ - 2♣ - 2♦ - 3♠ fit”" As we've discovered, it depends on when you read the poll, that was [i]not[/i] the original sequence ...
non-serious 3NT convention
I think I see what happened, at least as far as A&B. I thought in (one of) Benoit Lessard's post, he was referring to the 2 "obvious and classic" auctions in the text, not to the poll answers A&B. Hence that confusion. As far as making "that ...
non-serious 3NT convention
My recollection was that both were auctions where responder never explicitly bid/agreed opener's suit, hence my comment to the effect that neither was obvious or classic. I do remember thinking "fit was expressed clearly" was strange because no fit had been expressed clearly.
The Directors got this right or wrong?
And nobody said anything until after the match, it was board 1 of a 9-board match...
non-serious 3NT convention
Was the first auction in the text of the poll changed? And if so, from what?
non-serious 3NT convention
That doesn't seem to be the first auction I first saw...
.

Bottom Home Top