Browse hands and analyses from The Common Game, a free service where bridge clubs play identical hands and compare results across North America.
Join Bridge Winners
Member Profile
Michael Rosenberg
Michael Rosenberg
  • 4
    Following
  • 256
    Followers
  • 2
    Posts
  • 42
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Dec. 25, 2010
Last Seen
7 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Pro
about me
I am a full time professional player, and have been so since 2004 (before that, I was semi-professional). I play in all the Nationals, a few Regionals, and do a little online teaching. My wife Debbie is also a full-time professional. We have a son, Kevin. I have two daughters, Ivana and Jahna, from a previous marriage

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
Winning the 1994 Rosenblum
Bridge Accomplishments
Winner of Rosenblum, 1998 Par Contest, 4 US Trials, Spingold(2), Vanderbilt(2), Reisinger(2), More
Regular Bridge Partners
Zia Mahmood, Debbie Rosenberg, Chris Willenken
Favorite Tournaments
World Championship(any), US Trials
Favorite Conventions
KeyCard Blackwood, Transfers, Jacoby 2N
BBO Username
scotty
ACBL Ranking
Grand Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
BTC
3N on these auctions with (say)Jx is only a consideration (for me) if I have no other choice. That would usually be over their 3-of-a-Major. Also, 3N is more attractive against non-vul opponents, who are more likely to have a poor suit.
BTC
And the A magically disappears?
Slam Play Decision
South had 10, so J play not relevant
Game Play Decision
When East doubled 3 he was taking a big chance - that his partner might underlead the A (hoping for Kx). Would he take this chance with the A in his hand? Doubtful. Combine that with the fact of West's vulnerable weak two on a king high suit and ...
1!S (4!H) 4NT
Phil, if you have a hand such as x, ---, KJxxxx, KQxxxx you have no reasonable call over 1(4). Not close to 5N. and both double and pass are, in my opinion, favorites to lead to disaster. All you can do is guess at 5 of a minor ...
1!S (4!H) 4NT
4N for minors (in addition to the advantages provided by slam try in diamonds and an additional slam try in spades) would be bid on any appropriate 6-5 or 6-6 hands. It would also be bid on some appropriate 5-5 hands. If I wanted to bid 4N natural, but am ...
1!S (4!H) 4NT
Since the question was "should be" I feel confident that the answer is "Other." KC Blackwood is a very narrow target. You should already have 3 slam tries (5, 5 and another we shall see). If you get dealt a perfect KC hand, boo-hoo. To say that you ...
Use the Tools
It's a LOT easier to read a long article and pick on the thing(s) that are 'wrong' than it it is to write a totally unflawed long article (almost impossible). I find the ratio of correct (and interesting) things in this article (and every article you have written ...
What is wrong with using Double Dummy Simulations
Yuan: I wouldn't be surprised if your number (1) came close to approaching eqivalence - to be "close", it would have to be some some fraction of a trick, though I wouldn't know how to quantify what "small" means. You are correct that it is (2) I feel strongly ...
What is wrong with using Double Dummy Simulations
I just do not believe that if you take a thousand, or a million or even a billion hands, and discover that what actually happened at the table ON AVERAGE was close to what a DD simulation would have predicted, that you have really learned anything. Every hand is different ...
.