Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Mukesh Ghatiya

Mukesh Ghatiya
Mukesh Ghatiya
  • 0
    Following
  • 0
    Followers
  • 5
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Oct. 23, 2015
Last Seen
June 10
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Mukesh Ghatiya's bidding problem: KJ843 A A964 K62
I don't think hand is strong enough to warrant doubling and bidding again. If you double and if LHO bids 3H/4H, partner would not know what to do with moderate values and 3 card spade. If you bid again without him taking any action, you would show much ...
Mukesh Ghatiya's lead problem: 873 J9743 6 QT94
Sorry, should have updated earlier. Spade lead worked best. I forgot the hand now, but it prevented the extra club trick that declarer got because of leading club to his KJ and partner had something in spades.
Mukesh Ghatiya's bidding problem: KJ843 A A964 K62
Yes, 4 makes. I had passed.
Mukesh Ghatiya's bidding problem: KJ843 A A964 K62
Thanks folks for your comments. This was the full hand: http://tinyurl.com/lsenj24 . I took the losing call. Still not quite convinced that it was anti percentage.
Mukesh Ghatiya's bidding problem: KJ843 A A964 K62
It would be great if people could also share their thoughts on how they upvalued/devalued and finally came to their decision.
Mukesh Ghatiya's lead problem: 873 J9743 6 QT94
Thanks Brad. Yes, I also felt singleton lead with five trumps to be of no use. You don't build extra trick for yourself and are also foregoing potential of possible forcing game. In the game I also chose club (I chose small club rather than Ten, but I agree ...
No followers yet
Not following anyone yet
.

Bottom Home Top