Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Paul Barden

Paul Barden
Paul Barden
  • 0
  • 17
  • 19
  • 0

Basic Information

Member Since
Aug. 20, 2015
Last Seen
14 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

EBU biography

United Kingdom

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
7S puzzle in segment 7
Suppose you know that clubs are 5-2 and spades are 1-4. Then each opponent has 7 vacant spaces for red cards, so hearts 3-2 either way is equally likely. Call the probability of 3-2 one way p (we could work out what it is, but we needn't). Either line ...
This isn't "Just bridge"? USBC Appeal #2
South can tell from the opening lead that declarer has a heart stop. So what else can 3 show but four spades?
Zero tolerance at club games (club directors' comments are appreciated)
I'm not impressed by South's telling opponents about the clubs, where he had a strong holding, rather than the overall shape implications. A better explanation might be "I haven't promised club length: I could have any game-forcing hand which is willing to play in 3NT opposite a ...
Zero tolerance at club games (club directors' comments are appreciated)
East's entitled to check politely whether he's been properly informed about North-South's agreements. South is entitled to object politely to comments about his bidding. There's no need for it to escalate. Zero Tolerance ought to be about encouraging friendly behaviour, not a weapon in the hands ...
Missed slam - who was more responsible
Or he might listen to the auction.
7S puzzle in segment 7
Arguably it's not difficult for LHO to discard deceptively from a 4-card minor here, with the heart suit fairly obviously the key to the contract. But Michael Rosenberg did in fact (according to the BBO record) discard a club from 1345, so it's evidently not routine. And RHO ...
Missed slam - who was more responsible
Ken, I doubt West would see his xxx as a promising attempt to hold the lead. He'd be more likely to try his AK.
Missed slam - who was more responsible
If South had - AQJxxxx xx KQJx, whose fault would it be when they went off at the five level?
Legal: AI or UI?
No. Partner's statement that he thought 8 was a trump is plainly UI. Opponents' statement that 8 was not a trump is plainly AI. That's all the AI available to you from the exchange. Comments are not "traits", regardless of who hears them. The laws do not say ...
Legal: AI or UI?
Opponents told you that 8 was not a trump. That's AI.
Not following anyone yet

Bottom Home Top