Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Paul Hightower

Paul Hightower
Paul Hightower
  • 6
  • 10
  • 75
  • 0

Basic Information

Member Since
June 28, 2016
Last Seen
11 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Good club player, can't afford travel or tournaments. Long time contributor at

United States of America

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Non Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Style Poll Part 2
Other: simply 4. Partner clearly has spades and so we know we have a 4-4 fit. Partner cannot be so sure. Does anyone double in the sandwich, and then pass, with only 3 spades?
Style Poll
Auction 1 is a game invitation, based on some combination of high cards and playing strength. I am not clear where that falls between your second and third options, so I have tmeporarily selected "other".
David Parsons's bidding problem: J3 2 AQ9753 K765
Right, overlooked the Puppet part, so it is vital that 3 then 4 be natural and slammish.
Invitational or Forcing?
Oops. "Never mind!"
Invitational or Forcing?
Your description of West's 2 as either "forcing" or "non-forcing constructive" leaves out the rock solid standard for the last 80 years or so (in North America, at least) that, over an opponents takeout double, a new suit at the 2 level is weak.
Paul D East's bidding problem: 7 --- AQ964 AKQT975
Vulnerable, I expect partner to have some values, so I like our chances to make 6 or defeat 6.
David Parsons's bidding problem: J3 2 AQ9753 K765
Agreed. It looks to me that the 3 gadget is simply copied from the SAYC 2 gadget over 1NT, which at least has the advantage of low memory burden. Neither the SAYC card nor booklet includes a use of 3 over 2NT. Minor suit games and slams ...
Nicholas France's bidding problem: xx Qxx AQJx AJxx
My style has always been to raise with this sort of hand. In favor of a 1NT rebid, however, is that neither opponent overcalled in spades. Of course, I just went down Friday in 3NT when they cashed a 4-4 major and a side Ace :)
Fancy Falsecard
Pass looks reasonable in standard to me, but the hand is probably worth an 11 point Precision opener.
David Parsons's bidding problem: J3 2 AQ9753 K765
Note that BWS 2017 defines 3 as showing both minors. I would add that it should be forcing to game!

Bottom Home Top