Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Phillip Martin

Phillip Martin
Phillip Martin
  • 31
    Following
  • 163
    Followers
  • 93
    Posts
  • 48
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
July 12, 2011
Last Seen
7 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Writer
about me

Phillip Martin lives in Scarsdale, New York. He is the Chief Technology Officer for Gargoyle Strategic Investments in Englewood, New Jersey. He is also a composer, currently serving as Composer-in-Residence for Hartford Opera Theater. While he retired from tournament play some twenty years ago to pursue other interests, he has remained active in bridge as a writer, contributing occasional articles to The Bridge World and Bridge Today and publishing a bridge blog, The Gargoyle Chronicles.

Country
United States of America

Bridge Information

BBO Username
phillipmartin
ACBL Ranking
Diamond Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Michael Moschella's bidding problem: AQ AKT98532 --- AQ5
Even if you do get a second chance, a delayed action will show primary spades. If, for example, the auction goes 1-P-1-P/2-P-P-4, partner will play you for something like 6-6 in the majors. The only way to say you are serious about hearts and only ...
Michael Moschella's bidding problem: AQ AKT98532 --- AQ5
You mean on the next board, after you defend 1 on this one?
Gerben Dirksen's bidding problem: 7 K6432 2 KJT864
I like to keep the auction low when partner makes a take-out double and I have a singleton in their suit. Partner usually has a strong, offshape double and will appreciate the opportunity to describe his hand. So I'll start with 2. I think there is virtually no ...
For those of a certain age
If I had a choice, I would prefer the new scoring had gone into affect a few years earlier. I lost the Blue Ribbon Pairs in Lancaster by failing to find a sacrifice in 7NT.
Andy Caranicas's lead problem: A3 9653 K82 T632
Agree. If I lead a high heart, partner might expect the same hand with the K instead of the K.
What does this 3!s bid mean
That works if partner happens to bid 3NT. But if he doesn't, you don't get a chance to clarify.
What does this 3!s bid mean
Whichever of 1, 2, or 3 your partnership chooses, it needs to pick one. I don't see how you can play this as ambiguous. Since there is no opportunity to clarify, if it's ambiguous, the bid is worthless.
Jenish Shah's bidding problem: KJ2 Q8 Q742 J954
I make the same call I would make without that narrative—or with any other narrative in its place.
Thomas Berg's bidding problem: AQT75 A62 Q6 QT8
Pass. Rivera's rule.
What would you have done?
What would the player's memo say exactly? This player bid his hand more conservatively than I would?
.

Bottom Home Top