Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Richard Margolis

Richard Margolis
Richard Margolis
  • 0
  • 9
  • 5
  • 2

Basic Information

Member Since
Nov. 10, 2012
Last Seen
an hour ago
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Kevin Fay's bidding problem: AJ976 AQ874 --- QT5
Opposite one of my own 2-level overcalls, this would be an easy 6 call. However, without knowledge of partner's style, I am discouraged by the 2NT call ( wastage) and the simple raise to 4, when we are informed that 4 would have been stronger. In ...
Kyle Rockoff's bidding problem: Ax KT73 KQJx KJx
To make an informed decision, we need to know our agreements here. I tend to play that pass over their RDBL is penalty, except "under the gun" at the 1-level. If we had that agreement, I would certainly defend and, with David, table the K. Absent such information, I ...
Phyllis Yates's bidding problem: xx Axx x AQxxxxx
I'm not happy voting with the plurality here with 3, since (a) I don't know if passing partner's putative 3NT call will be right, and (b) the opponents hold , probably 4 - 4, and I don't want to give them the opportunity to discover their ...
Thomas Berg's bidding problem: A52 84 AQJ4 J987
What we hold is an invitational raise in , silly 5-card support mandate notwithstanding. We therefore show our invitational raise with 2. Not DBL, lest we play a 3 - 3 fit. Not 2, since when we next bid we will show an unbalanced hand, when we ...
Peg Kaplan's bidding problem: AK Q862 9854 763
Bob, the information you seek about trick-taking ability in an 8-card vs. a 9-card fit may be found in Lawrence and Wirgren's excellent book I Fought The Law. They ran extensive computer simulations and published detailed charts with the outcome. Their purpose, of course, was to discredit the so-called ...
ATB - missed grand
Opening 2 on a 2-suiter, with primary and a 5-card major, is just begging for trouble. It is trivial to reach 7 in 4 calls after opening 1: 1 - 1H, 5NT - 7H. Subsequently, South announced a strong 2-bid in with secondary , when, in ...
Guillaume Fauconnier's bidding problem: AQ7543 3 6 AQJ52
Bidding 4 could be very wrong, but we hold so much more offense than a 1 overcall might contain that I feel constrained to call again. I would like a higher third , but we must play with what we were dealt. When KX of CL and a ...
Peg Kaplan's bidding problem: AK Q862 9854 763
The opponents knew they were off AK of when they competed to 3, and it seems highly unlikely that we will defeat them more than 1 trick. Yes, we probably have a plus score to protect, but the matchpoint difference between +50 and +100 will be minimal, perhaps ...
Tore Skoglund's bidding problem: 6 Q543 8 AKJ8652
While we likely hold the playing strength for 3, we create a context in which partner will expect greater H/C strength and could easily and reasonably take us beyond our depth. Where are the ? If partner holds them, that diminishes the prospect of running without a ...
Rohit Gupta's bidding problem: --- 87654 7543 AK85
Why call 4? Either an invitational-plus call, according to our methods, intending to bid again anyway, or a splinter of 3 is superior to the blunt bash of 4. Is it any great surprise that the auction now comes back to us at 4? We should ...
Not following anyone yet

Bottom Home Top