Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Robert Stevens

Robert Stevens
Robert Stevens
  • 4
    Following
  • 7
    Followers
  • 31
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
April 7, 2013
Last Seen
6 minutes ago
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
What do you make of this?
The c word is too strong. But this, in my experience, is happening very frequently to the point where it has to have become, by previous experience, an undisclosed agreement. I regret my choice of word, but not the strength of my feeling about this.
Your call after 2!c opener’s penalty double
For those interested in the result: The overcaller, one of those who are never happy unless their lips are moving, held q10875 KQ9 Ax 108, asking to get an unwanted lead. The 2 opener held AKJ6 AJ !KQAKQxx. 6 would make on a non lead but ...
What do you make of this?
Then don’t.
What do you make of this?
This seems to be another case, which is now epidemic, of announcing a certain notrump range and yet always using it with a hand one point weaker than promised. Cheating, the only word for it. You’d have to hold a gun to my head to have me bid 1n ...
how do you bid this hand?
Ah but you just did? Whose paradox is this?
Your call after 2!c opener’s penalty double
At the table it was ostensibly negative, a hand that would have bid 2. Double would have been penalty. Not everyone plays that way. If you would have doubled to show a bad hand without reference to you can assume the next two bids would have been the ...
Your call after 2!c opener’s penalty double
Thomas, quite right. IMP team of four
What Does This Double Mean Part3: Transferable Values to the Sky
Please reread para2 immediately above. It is fallacious to say you lose nothing. Sometimes the opps will have really screwed you: if you don’t redress the balance when they are dead wrong you give them Carte Blanche.
What Does This Double Mean Part3: Transferable Values to the Sky
I think you are suggesting, correct me please if not, that the hand with the void should double and the other hand, lacking let’s say, 2+ trump tricks, should remove. Well, that is a way to play. Perhaps that was the intent of the 60%, but I doubt it.
How aggressive are you?
Are u planning on converting to ?
.

Bottom Home Top