Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Sam Lichtenstein

Sam Lichtenstein
Sam Lichtenstein
  • 34
  • 9
  • 15
  • 92

Basic Information

Member Since
Feb. 9, 2012
Last Seen
11 hours ago
Member Type
bridge player

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Seeking PhD Candidate for 3 year Bridge Project
While it sounds like a fine (cost ineffective, likely fruitless, but perhaps mildly entertaining] way to promote bridge, I’m struggling to understand the *scientific* rationale for funding this social *science* research project. Like, for example, other than the funding from bridge organizations, why is the sociology of bridge worth ...
Introducing BBOH (anti-cheating device)
So you're saying very tall players should be allowed to cheat? (I ask on behalf of those of us who are vertically challenged. :-)
Grade This Pass
Kevin Rosenberg's bidding problem: KQxx xx Kx Axxxx
I think you'd get more informative results if you asked people NOT to answer if they'd seen the first part? Asking them to ignore the first part of the poll (as I tried to do) seems like asking them not to think of an elephant.
In the Well: Eric Rodwell
I see 8 likely tricks with play for 9, with 4 likely cold. Seems like a poor bid to me, but what do I know?
Where is the problem?
West is not a minimum. With appropriate agreements, I think 3NT by west is mandatory over 3.
In the Well: Eric Rodwell
From either recent memory or your entire career, what hand stands out as the one which gives you the greatest pride in your declarer play?
We have a dying sport in our hands
No sport that is broadcast on Youtube can be totally dead:
Interesting Hand - the Article
Lolz. But X is still crazy
Eugene Hung's bidding problem: 4 A2 A9874 KQ753
I agree that (non)-Leaping Michaels is awkward here. But it seems playable as long as you make the agreement that over South's double in this position, North's 4 bid shows five cards. With such an agreement passing 4 seems fine. Without heart tolerance (e.g ...

Bottom Home Top