Bridge Winners Profile for Steve Myerson
Basic Information
- Member Since
- April 13, 2013
- Last Seen
- Oct. 11
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- Country
- United States of America
Bridge Information
- ACBL Ranking
- Bronze Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- Common game 9 October afternoon board 23
- On the third round of hearts, south discards the king of clubs.
- Robin Barker's bidding problem: AT9 --- QJT632 AQJ6
- Describing it as [i]artificial[/i] is not sufficient. The explanation should include what it does show.
- Gabriel Carrasco's bidding problem: AQJ4 AQ95 3 AT75
- Is 2♣ forcing?
- Gabriel Carrasco's bidding problem: AQJ4 AQ95 3 AT75
- Wouldn't South have bid 1♠ instead of 2♣ if holding 4 spades?
- Benoit Lessard's bidding problem: Q98 AJxx AJxx xx
- 2♣ was not forcing. 2N also not forcing. And now we're in a forcing auction?
- Opening 10 HCP 6m331 hands playing Matchpoints
- Thank you, but the answers still aren't all inclusive. You need "Neither and will pass hand 1 and open hand 2 3♣". That's not my choice, but the answers should cover all possibilities.
- Drew Casen's bidding problem: QJ9 Axx Txx Q9xx
- My definition of unbalanced, and I'm probably in the minority here, is a hand which contains a singleton or void.
- Opening 10 HCP 6m331 hands playing Matchpoints
- Where is the option for neither?
- Drew Casen's bidding problem: QJ9 Axx Txx Q9xx
- 3♥. If partner doesn't take that to be a cue in support of clubs, partner is 100% unbalanced.
- Benoit Lessard's bidding problem: Q98 AJxx AJxx xx
- I agree with David. At IMPS, making 5♦ instead of 3N isn't a disaster. Unless I knew 100% that partner would take 3♥ as a cue in support of diamonds, I would not risk making that bid. 4♦ will not be confusing.
See all comments
Not following anyone yet