Bridge Winners Profile for Steve Myerson
Basic Information
- Member Since
- April 13, 2013
- Last Seen
- 12 hours ago
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- Country
- United States of America
Bridge Information
- Regular Bridge Partners
- Chris, Deborah, Eva, Greg
- BBO Username
- TriplThret
- ACBL Ranking
- Silver Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: 72 A2 KJ AT87432
- Double because I think 6♥ is going down plus it has the added chance that partner will lead dummy's first bid suit, establishing a possible diamond trick while I still have trump control.
- ATB
- East gets 45% for the double and another 45% for 2♠. West gets 10% for agreeing to play with East.
- Türker Tarhan's bidding problem: K7654 J3 A7665 K
- I passed, but if the 5 of diamonds were another 6, I might open.
- Bob Simkins's bidding problem: 7 J86532 8654 T7
- It's a trade-off. I prefer to play 3♥ as preemptive. I can pass if I've got nothing, so 2♥ over 1♠ shows some values.
- Bob Simkins's bidding problem: 7 J86532 8654 T7
- They wouldn't be at 3♣ had I bid 3♥ at my first opportunity.
- Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: KQ9874 KQT7 K KJ
- In the original post. 2NT: Forcing heart raise
- Optimum contract at Swiss teams
- [b] At the table [/b] Partner and I got to 4♠ via 1♠ - 2N; 3♦ - 4♠. I got a diamond lead. Spades were 3-2 and diamonds 3-3 (queen offside) so wound up making 7. My partner and I were wondering if we should have gotten to ...
- Optimum contract at Swiss teams
- Ed, the "why" is what I'm looking for. Going down in a slam when your opponents have stopped in game can lose IMPs just as can stopping in game when the opponents make slam.
- Marten La Haye's bidding problem: 4 AT6 AQ654 AKJ8
- 3♠ would have been ok with a running minor. Lacking one, I would have bid 3♣ instead of 3♠.
- Martin Lindfors's bidding problem: KQ9874 KQT7 K KJ
- So after South bids a [b]game forcing [/b] 2NT, a bid of 3♥ is not forcing? Incredible!
See all comments
Not following anyone yet