Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Ulf Nilsson

Ulf Nilsson
Ulf Nilsson
  • 95
    Following
  • 63
    Followers
  • 11
    Posts
  • 24
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
June 23, 2010
Last Seen
6 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Pro
about me

Ulf Nilsson

Website
http://viewsfromthebridgetable.blogspot.com/

Bridge Information

BBO Username
ulven
ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: A4 J32 AJT9876 Q
Unfortunately, 5D was -1100, 4H should go down but made at the other table. In 5D you had 2 heart losers(!), 2 trump losers and 2 black suit losers...
Ulf Nilsson's lead problem: KQJ8765 A75 9 76
http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?bbo=y&linurl=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/vugraph_linfetch.php?id=49632 Board 2
Ulf Nilsson's lead problem: KQJ8765 A75 9 76
If Steve Weinstein drops by here, maybe he can answer. He was South at one of the tables. Btw, the auction was identical at both tables and neither South found a winning lead.
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: J9765 K862 K4 75
4S was chosen, promptly axed by opener for down 2, losing 8 imps to diamond partscore at other table. Partner: AT832 A93 2 Q963
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: 74 A62 A842 A654
Partner had xx KQJx KQJT Qxx 4H made on favorable splits and club K onside. Opponents got there after 2nd hand got to open, 1D pass 1H 1S
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: 84 762 95 KQJ632
Both I and Lauria chose X. I'm sure 1NT would have led 3NT down on a spade lead from KJxxx.
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: J973 K75 QJ62 K4
Partner's hand: AT8x Jx Kxx AQ9x Spades 4-1 offside, all 3-level contracts go down.
Ulf Nilsson's bidding problem: 84 762 95 KQJ632
Partner's hand: xx AQJx AK9xx Ax
Feedback for Convention Chart, Part 2
Peter, which of 'artificial' or 'natural' fits the bill best? :-)
Feedback for Convention Chart, Part 2
"Natural" I fail to see why a constructive 2-level canapé opening should not be deemed natural. As written now, from what I can tell, it´s not. Say 2H = 11-15 4H & 5+C or 2S = 12-15, 4M & 5+m (either). I'd suggest that a 2-level opening bid with 4-cards ...
.

Bottom Home Top