Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Yuan Shen

Yuan Shen
Yuan Shen
  • 328
    Following
  • 232
    Followers
  • 364
    Posts
  • 523
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
June 1, 2011
Last Seen
41 minutes ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Believe that an opening bid opposite an opening bid should have some play for 1NT.

Wish I could play more bridge.

 

Redoubled contracts made: 1C, 1D, 1H, 2D, 2S, 3S, 3NT, 4H, 4S, 4NT, 5C, 5D, 5H, 6C, 6D, 6H, 6S

Redoubled contract gone down in: 2C, 2NT, 4H, 4S, 5C, 5D, 5H, 5S, 6D, 6S

Country
United Kingdom

Bridge Information

Bridge Accomplishments
Manfield Non-Life Master
Member of Bridge Club(s)
Aberystwyth
Favorite Tournaments
Nationals! Chicago Winterfest
Favorite Conventions
Flannery
BBO Username
shengabus
ACBL Ranking
Life Master
Some help needed.
My point is there *are* exceptions. Exactly those ones (your example type is the same as mine). Obviously, 2NT is bid on the hands that are strong with stopper(s).
Some help needed.
Something many players playing support doubles don't realise is that there has to be a strong-balanced option in there. The double is presumed to be support if minimum, Say you pick up Kxx Ax AQJx KJ10x and opened 1m 1m (Pass) 1 (1) ? I would double (wouldn ...
How do you play this bid?
I voted for "don't know" but there's something to takeout of diamonds, with an aim to 3NT. Responder rarely has 4 spades and when he does, he's almost broke (to pass 1). He also rarely has values and a heart stop (didn't bid 1NT). It ...
Andy Stark's bidding problem: A9762 T842 KT KJ
Richard, if (when) partner bids 2, I bid 4. I would splinter with a direct 4, the delayed jump is a Bluhmer.
Karel de Raeymaeker's bidding problem: Kxx Txx AJx AQxx
Not often I agree with Lynn, but the previous double was not good.
A loser-ruffing squeeze?
Well I sort of agree. I don't think people have looked at the hand carefully enough. It is essential to set up a red suit winner first, and that involves a squeeze.
3NT - perhaps this is where Jim is heading
Axx Kx x AKQxxxx
2d response to opening strong artificial 2C
The old-fashioned Swedish approach is simple: 2 = 20-21 or strong, and 2 - 2M/3m are all non-forcing.
2d response to opening strong artificial 2C
I quite like the following follow-ups after 2 - 2; ?, where 2 is hearts-or-balanced. 2 = minimum balanced range (so reverse Kokish, 2 then forces 2NT) 2 = relay to 2NT 2NT = strong natural 3 | = GF in | respectively (responder bids the cheapest step ...
A loser-ruffing squeeze?
Sure, I agree.
.

Bottom Home Top