Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Zygmunt Marcinski

Zygmunt Marcinski
Zygmunt Marcinski
  • 2
    Following
  • 7
    Followers
  • 1
    Posts
  • 1
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
June 26, 2011
Last Seen
15 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
introduction to bridge on my father's lap
Bridge Accomplishments
CNTC winner
Regular Bridge Partners
Bryan Maksymetz, Nicolas l'Ecuyer
Favorite Tournaments
Summer NABC
Favorite Conventions
Strong 1C
ACBL Ranking
Gold Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
What do you play at trick three? The rest of the story
Deleted (misread) with apologies
2 parter
Michael R: LOL ..... thank you for stating my case so effectively .... after all, even you will find it a tall task to successfully reconcile your two following statements: (A) "(...) the PRESUMPTION should be that 3 says nothing about values" (emphasis mine) (B) "(...) I don't see how my conclusion ...
2 parter
Michael R: "If 2N is defined as a scramble, then 3 shows zero values." In the absence of OP elaborating on his partnership's agreed distinction (usually about strength) if any between (A) 3 directly over X versus (B) scrambling 2N followed by a 3 correction, your ...
Happy Trails, Matt Smith
If anything, the foregoing plaudits are inadequate. Congratulations on an outstanding career and best wishes for a happy and long retirement Matt. I am left with the hope of having the pleasure of crossing swords with you (perhaps with Duncan?) at the bridge table should it now beckon to you ...
2019 Canadian National Team Championships
The second place team included another though former Montrealer, Nick Gartaganis: a formidable and always resourceful adversary who oozes from every pore both irreproachable manners and unimpeachable ethics.
Your call
RR, I regret that your eloquent remarks do not in the least succeed in dissuading me from holding fast to my position that 4 is a decidedly inferior rebid vis-a-vis 5. Having pummelled each other with arguments defending our respective views, without any noticeable dent in each other ...
Your call
RR - multiple: see my remarks upthread
Your call
RR, The only argument in favour of a 4 in lieu of 5 rebid by the 2NT overcaller is uncertainty (aka lack of trust?) over the intended meaning of the 3 advance. I have already argued downthread that anything other than the "what's in front of ...
Your call
RR - certainly Advancer can have your example hand IF his partnership style precludes a 1st/2nd seat preempt without hand pattern and value location (FWIW, I confess that I subscribe to such a style, and so facing myself the example you lay out would be a possibility). Having said that ...
Your call
RR - my remarks were predicated on what I believed to be a near certainty that a passed hand 3 advance must be based on support and adequate values - yet the remarks of the preponderance of posters to date suggest that in holding so I am in a distinct ...
.

Bottom Home Top