Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
About the Author
266 followers
Believe that an opening bid opposite an opening bid should have some play for 1NT.
Wish I could play more bridge.
Redoubled contracts made: 1C, 1D, 1H, 2D, 2S, 3S, 3NT, 4H, 4S, 4NT, 5C, 5D, 5H, 6C, 6D, 6H, 6S
Redoubled contract gone down in: 2C, 2NT, 4H, 4S, 5C, 5D, 5H, 5S, 6D, 6S
Read more »Matchpoints, None vulnerable
♠
108xx
♥
AK10xxx
♦
Qx
♣
x
W
N
E
S
P
P
1♣
P
1♥
P
2NT
P
?
Swiss pairs, leading in a weak field.
You considered opening, but systemically you probably would have had to try 2♦ Flannery, and decided against it.
1♣ is 2+ (may be balanced, but 1♦ is not strictly unbalanced).
All your 3-level bids now are natural-ish (including minor-forcing) and forcing.
4♣ is probably an auto-splinter, but no specific agreement.
What's your call?
Redouble
Pass
Double
Abstain
1♣
1♦
1♥
1♠
1NT
2♣
2♦
2♥
2♠
2NT
3♣
3♦
3♥
3♠
3NT
4♣
4♦
4♥
4♠
4NT
5♣
5♦
5♥
5♠
5NT
6♣
6♦
6♥
6♠
6NT
7♣
7♦
7♥
7♠
7NT
Answer publicly What's this?
Getting results...
23 Comments