Join Bridge Winners
Solid Suit Design in Strong Systems

Power Precision, 1979, had a complicated method for showing responder's Solid Suits of 6-cds or longer:

 1- 3 = AKQJxx (6-cds) with or without outside controls:  4 asks for outside controls, 4 asks for suit, f(x) = 0.30%

1 - 3 = AKQxxxx (7-cds): no outside controls: 4 asks for singleton/void , 4 asks for suit, f(x) = 0.12%

1 - 3NT = AKQxxxx (7-cds): 4 asks for outside controls, 4 asks for suit, f(x) = 0.12%

1 - 4 = AKQxxxxx (8-cds): 4 asks for outside controls, 4 asks for suit, f(x) = 0.05%

 

In some of my systems I have used a simpler design with semi-solid / solid suits starting at 2NT (transfer) to uniquely identify the suit.  Slams are more important for IMPs than Match Point Pairs.

For the past 2-years, we have found other uses for responses of 3 and 3 (5-4 minor hands with shortage in the bid major).

What is the Bridgewinner's Community experience with solid suits by responder in a Strong System?

23 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top