Join Bridge Winners
All comments by David Goldfarb
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 18 19 20 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Your daughter is 16? Ugh. I remember her when she was five.
Oct. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You were born in the convention center where many tournaments were held? No wonder you went on to become a pro player.
Oct. 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
At any rate, my main point is that we needed at least one more poll option.
Oct. 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I play UDCA and Smith Echo.

I play Smith Echo the way Smith originally suggested: opening leader plays high-low to say that she doesn't want her suit returned (that's upside-down, right?) and third hand plays high-low to say that she has something good in the suit: an honor or extra length. (That's right-side-up, right? I'm honestly not sure.)
Oct. 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The OP specifies that this was a BBO game, where you alert your own bids and have no knowledge of whether partner has made any alerts or not. So UI considerations do not arise.
Sept. 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I voted for 18-19, but I'd do it with a good 17, and with a good 19 I'd just blast 3N.

Incidentally, Kaplan Inversion is now legal in most ACBL competitions, and gets you a few of your 1NT contracts back after 1H-1S; 1N-P.
Sept. 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The “K-S Updated” notes are available not just pretty cheap, but free online at the Bridge World web site: https://www.bridgeworld.com/indexphp.php?page=/pages/readingroom/kaplansheinwoldupdated.html
Sept. 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'm a little confused by this statement on page 6:

You can assume that East holds the ♣3, since if West has that card it won't matter what you do in clubs.

…haven't we just seen the 3? We know that East held that card.
Sept. 29
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I followed the link, and found that in fact he is on it.
Sept. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I play a weak NT (12-14, although Joe Quinn thinks my partner and I should announce 11+-14), and one thing I've invented is to use X for 15+ balanced with or without a stop. That frees up 2NT to show a hand that wanted to rebid 3m (16-18 with a good 6-card suit) and then 3m can be a hand with a good 6-card suit but not the World's Fair in high cards…sort of a 2.5m rebid.

After the X, partner can cue bid to ask for a stop, or if the intervention gets raise, double asks for a stop.
Sept. 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
On page 4:
“You will make if the king of spades is onside doubleton or tripleton. If not, you will need the ace of clubs onside.”

East opened a 2-bid, and is known to hold the KQ of diamonds. If the king of spades is in that hand also, how can the ace of clubs possibly be right? It seems like if the spade finesse is wrong you're just dead.
Sept. 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes. See below.
Aug. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If we pass 99% of 11-counts and open 1% including that one, does saying “11+” disclose or obfuscate? (99.78% / .22%, according to Craig Biddle just above me.)

I didn't keep the hand records from Saturday, but on that same day (maybe even the same session) I passed something like Kxx xx KJTxx Axx because it didn't have the requisite 3 QT. So, again: does “11+-14” instead of “12-14” improve disclosure or harm it?
Aug. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think you are reading the regulation much too narrowly. My interpretation, which I think is the common-sense one, is: “Disallowed if the only known suit in which length is shown is not the suit bid.” So for your first example, the fact that there is length shown in an unknown suit does nothing to rescue your bid.
Aug. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Probably all the people who have voted won't see this, but: how on earth can you pass? West passed her partner's 3 bid. She didn't think she could make a game. Now when partner is showing more strength, you think West's first judgment was wrong? I mean, I wouldn't go on to 5 either, but I think double is clear-cut.

Partner's hand was – AK63 AT63 AQJ82. Deep Finesse says that South can make 5, but even at double-dummy the play isn't obvious. 4 goes down 2, however.
Aug. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It's a takeout double of spades, that couldn't act on the first round precisely because of the spade shortness. Example hands might be xx KQJx AQxx Qxx, or A QJTx KQxxx xxx
Aug. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
And yes, I asked my partner’s permission before posting this poll.
Aug. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
And the Texas transfer shows primary and nothing else. If I bid diamonds at the 4-level and then rebid them again at the 5 or 6 level, partner will get the idea that the diamonds are longer. Thinking about it, I think my plan is 2N-3D; 4D and then a jump to 6D. Partner will get the idea that black aces and red top honors are what I need.
July 31
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Instead of trying to mastermind the bidding so that you find out about the cards, have you considered, y'know, showing your hand? After 2NT-3D; 3H-4D and then a continuation to the 5-level, partner might get the idea that red suit top honors are useful.
July 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Great bridge bragging name, and a direct reference to Mollo's Hideous Hog.
July 21
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 18 19 20 21
.

Bottom Home Top