Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Eric Hamilton
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Responder explained his <own call> as…” and said that he “took <a call by partner> as….”?

Several parts of my anatomy are hurting.
Oct. 9, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes. Added above, thanks.
Aug. 24, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What did 3S mean in the east/west methods? Clearly it's soliciting west's opinion on the 3N/4H question, but what does it suggest west should do with 9xxx?
Aug. 16, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ruff with the 9. If west follows to the second spade trick, AH and then finesse the heart jack. If west discards instead of overruffing, spend a while thinking about which heart holdings including the queen this particular west would not overruff with, and play the hearts accordingly.

If we end up with a trump loser (west overruffs at trick 2, west has four trumps, east has Qx or Qxx of trump) then we need the diamonds to break.
Aug. 12, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Don't hang your partner for balancing” - when partner balances, the better your hand is, the worse his hand probably is.
Aug. 10, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Interpret a negative double as “values to compete, interest in the unbid suits” and 5-5 in a very weak hand is possible.

There's nothing wrong with playing it as exactly 4-4, but in exchange for that accuracy you're giving up some chances to compete with weak shapely hands.
Aug. 5, 2017
Eric Hamilton edited this comment Aug. 5, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Quite agree about the interpretation of 1N and 2S.
Did this well-played 3-3 matchpoint well? Did declarer make happy faces at partner while playing it well? :)
Aug. 2, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That could turn out OK, but partner will expect more when an unpassed hand makes a double over a forcing bid, so might well overcompete.

We don't particularly want to be in this auction except to prevent the opponents from playing a red-suit partial in peace. Passing and balancing over 2H or 2D achieves that while making our limited ambitions clear.
July 29, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Me too, so I find the plurality vote for “pass” also a bit surprising.
July 27, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
An interesting and possibly relevant factoid:
The 16 teams in the Spingold round of 16 this year are exactly the 16 top seeds.
July 27, 2017
Eric Hamilton edited this comment July 27, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
> If you ran the Spingold with 7200 teams, it's not at all unlikely that a non-“name” team would win.

That may be an artefact of the knockout format. When a strong team suffers an early upset, their positive expectation in the subsequent rounds is irrelevant because they've been eliminated and won't play those rounds. Conversely, although a 7200 team round robin is clearly impractical, regression to the mean would make it very unlikely that any but the strongest teams would be in contention in that format.
July 26, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Three losers, eight and a half tricks opposite a bust, and a solid twice-biddable suit sounds like a 2C opener in these methods…. This 21 HCP meets the equivalent play strength criterion in “22+ or equivalent play strength”.

Consider that South would have bid the same way with Kx,AQxx,AKxx,AJx.
July 25, 2017
Eric Hamilton edited this comment July 25, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2S back at you after 1N is indeed a possibility…. But is the hypothetical 2S hole that much deeper than the 1S hole we're already in?
July 19, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The first “what is the logical interpretation of this undiscussed call?” question here is about 3S. Does it set the trump suit or not? And what is a minimum for that call?

It's hard to take a position on the relative merits of 4D and 4H without first making some assumption about the 3S call. So what do we expect it to show, undiscussed?
July 16, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
> classifying my alert as I know something you wouldn't normally expect from listening to the bidding.

What is that something? Asking not arguing here, because 2S weak is exactly what I'd expect from the bidding no matter how they handle their advances.
July 15, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Odd that declarer (who would have been the one to alert if an alert were required) is the one to bring it up after the auction. Did something happen at the table that made him feel that it needed to be said? It is not unreasonable for declarer to offer to further clarify his side's understandings after the auction is over even if no alertable call has been made.
July 15, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Club match points, basic 2/1 methods” allows for such a hand (at least in the clubs that I hang out at).


I presume you meant to say 2NT instead of 1NT? 1NT is insufficient :)
July 13, 2017
Eric Hamilton edited this comment July 13, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This approach does have the interesting property that you show your distribution with 4153 but hide it with 4351. 3N is the most likely game after this start, so that may not be a big deal - but if once in a blue moon partner doesn't have clubs under control we will have had an altogether avoidable accident.
July 12, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You can use your 15-17 methods. It won't be optimal, but it won't be unplayable.

You will want an agreement for how to handle a double of your 1N opener, and how to compete after the opponents bid over it - you'll be seeing a lot of both.
July 12, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If we're going to blow past the entire two-level with one call, I'd expect a bit more definition than “natural maximum passed hand”.
July 12, 2017
.

Bottom Home Top