Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Floyd McWilliams
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 28 29 30 31
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes, I think with 6 card support for one of my suits he could find a call at the 2 level.
May 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No; partner passed over 2
May 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are North, South opened.
May 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It's also weird to claim on a finesse when you have no idea what will happen when it fails (East may or may not have a heart left). That's why I think declarer forgot about the K.
April 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No but I would take a look at my driver's license … and the name on it is not “Jesus”, so I'm not saving.
April 27
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What is wrong with multiple polls?
April 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
These type problems are like throwing darts at yourself and hoping you miss.
April 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This was a great problem. Thank you for posting it.
April 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A co-worker made the following observation that shows the two cases are not symmetrical:

The number of 3-die rolls that produce 1->2 is 12 (x 1 2 and 1 2 x).

But the number of such rolls producing 6->6 is only 11.
April 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Double at this level suggests defending, but perhaps this is not the best agreement.
April 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The system opening for a 10-15 hand with West's shape is 1.
April 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 is natural (5+) and forcing one round.
April 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 would be natural and forcing (for one round)
April 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 was natural and a one round force, so feel free to blame East.
April 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The first and second doubles were not made by the same player.
March 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If all you care about is whether partner has diamond control, maybe the proper bid is 5 over 4?
March 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks for fixing it, Oren. I am glad you posted this poll, it is very educational.
Feb. 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Come on, West is never bidding over 4. If you want to catch a fish, pass and hope to double 2.
Feb. 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My vote would be “Tend to rebid 2oM in preference to 2M and 2” but that isn't a choice.
Feb. 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Option C, I post a bidding poll.
Feb. 20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 28 29 30 31
.

Bottom Home Top