Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Joel Shapiro
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This has got to be one of the longest posts I have ever seen on BW.

Also one of the best.

Quality AND quantity! Well done.
May 4, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I can see a scientifically rigorous double-blind study shaping up now. Each partner yells at the other “Are you blind?????”
May 4, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Your partner took some extra time to think about his/her last bid. That's okay - all players need to do that from time to time. But now, you must make sure that your next call is based solely on your own cards and not on what you think your partner may have been thinking about.”
April 30, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My wife would frequently like to modify the way I bid, that's for sure.

I invented this silly convention in September 1998 when in the course of that one month I had five (5) such hands. The bid worked four times and failed miserably once.

I have not held such a hand since, but hope springs eternal.
April 26, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I use the eponymous Shapiro convention. Any hand with 29 or more points, and seven of the eight aces and kings, is opened 6NT. Partner is expected to raise to seven with the other ace or king. It doesn't always work but it's a lot of fun and makes for a good story at the bar after the game.
April 24, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Good luck getting some North American players to even fill out CC's.
April 10, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Are you sure it was the Bermuda Bowl he won? Methinks it might have been the Bermuda Triangle…
March 28, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Level the playing field by programming the bots with early-onset Alzheimers.
March 25, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If there was ever to be a tournament at the base of Mount Rushmore, there would be four very distinguished kibitzers!
March 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
When was there ever a tournament in South Dakota?
March 21, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Most liked. Most enjoyed. Most fun. Irrespective of attendance (some might have attended but not enjoyed) and irrespective of masterpoints won (some may have enjoyed the tournament despite the fact that the results were not commensurate with their ability).
March 20, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Just curious, as a corollary to this discussion - I would be interested to know which NABC's in the past several years have been the most liked by regular attendees, and why.
March 20, 2018
Joel Shapiro edited this comment March 20, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
There are so many shades of grey in bridge that I am looking forward to the book “25 shades of grey in bridge” and the sequel “25 more shades of grey in bridge”. Then the complete 2-volume set - “50 shades of…..” oh, wait a minute….
March 15, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I applaud this initiative, and hate to rain on anyone's parade, but I think that the button is poorly designed. The red circle with slash is meant to NEGATE whatever is inside the circle. For example, a no-smoking sign shows a cigarette inside the circle/slash. So by saying “say no to cheats” inside the circle, the button actually is saying “don't say no to cheats”. It would be better if, inside the circle, there was only one word - “cheats” or “cheating”.
March 15, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Maybe partner is expecting me to bid 5C while at the same time stopping the opponents from using Blackwood themselves.
Feb. 25, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Isn't ‘derision’ that system that my ex-partners always used to play with me?
Feb. 23, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Next time we have a poll like this, please allow for more than one selection. Maybe even “all of the above”.
Feb. 23, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Go Fish.
Feb. 18, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The quarterback-receiver relationship is more like a team of four than a partnership. The referee and replay person are also required to determine if a catch is indeed a catch.
Feb. 18, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I have often wondered why the subsequent LM ranks (bronze, silver, gold, and all those new precious stones) do not each have increased numbers of coloured points in their requirements, proportional to those required of the original LM designation.

One can today become a silver LM (1000 points) with just the coloured points needed for the original LM 500-point level, plus 500 more black points. Add 1500 more black points and one is now a gold LM. Shouldn't one need more silver to be a silver LM, red points to be a ruby LM, gold to be a gold LM, etc.?

To become a sapphire LM, you will need blue points. These are available at quality seafood restaurants in New England and Atlantic Canada.
Feb. 18, 2018
.

Bottom Home Top