Join Bridge Winners
All comments by John Moschella
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If partner had stiff spade how could they be thinking about what signal to give when they have no choice???
March 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yu if player had stiff spade and 4 hearts then when they win ace of clubs they would return a heart which it sounds like everyone would now assume is a singleton but also could have been 4 card holding. Although I believe when Q is played or returned clear it is singleton.
March 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Are some if not all the links you are talking about the links to see the daily bulletins at tournaments. Something that has saved the regional I chair significant money over the last few years.
March 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sure my first regional pairs win with I believe approx. 250 pairs back when 1 event a day paid about 25 gold and now can win 30 in a 15 table game with a side gold rush. Not sure how this relates to actual achievements. Yes players will average more points this year than in the past. Used to win top 500 with about 500 points now 3000.

Seems like concern is that players now may be perceived to be equal to a player from the past with the same number of points.
March 5, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Yet, I think most would claim that the accuracy between masterpoints & accomplishment were far more closely aligned decades ago than in today's era.”

Why would one think this?? When I first started circa 89 I thought more masterpoints meant better player but eventually realized this wasn't true then as it is not true now.
March 5, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Jeff,

Although your district may have approved your table count loss due to reach I am not sure that I would have considered reach on Friday the reason your table count wad down 7 tables although may have some impact.

Last year you had 141 tables over the 3 days and this year 113 tables over the 3 days. A drop of 28 tables. 7 on Friday, 13 on Saturday and 8 on Sunday. Seems your least drop occurred on the day of Reach. Last year Friday to Saturday increased 7.5 tables, this year Friday to Saturday only 1.5 tables.
Feb. 14, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1. In the eighteen years from 1995 to 2013 the number of ACBL sanctioned clubs shrunk by how many?

Again not sure where this question is going. In my area there were either 5 or 6(possibly more clubs) that all moved to a single bridge center. Originally they all kept their own sanctions and that over the years decreased as the table count went up.
In the last few years I believe they have gone to a single sanction for all the games so that they could combine games.
So from question I would say that in Orlando area that first question would have been probably 10 to 4 from 1999-2013 and then from 4 to 2 now. Club split and some of the outlander games combined with a new club.
However I expect table count has gone from about 7000 in 2013 to about 10000 now within the Orlando clubs.
So there are significantly less clubs but more bridge going on in Orlando.

Financially renting a space one day a week does not make sense for small clubs so small games will die off but if part of a bridge center than they potentially can survive and grow.
Jan. 27, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Question: What percent of the 2,850 sanctioned ACBL clubs hold a sanction for at least one weekly novice duplicate game?
Answer: 5%.

What is the definition of a weekly novice duplicate game. This percentage seems low but maybe their are enough clubs that can only have a single session going on so it would be open.
Jan. 27, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Question: On average, what percent of students who start out as beginners in a sanctioned ACBL club's teaching program eventually wind up playing in that club's Open duplicate games?
Answer: About 3%.

At our club they run a couple of beginner bridge programs a year. I do not expect our club to be something spectacular in their teaching program. My 2 sons took a class. I believe about 12 people attended. I know of at least 6 who played duplicate games at the club. If the question is how many of them will eventually get to more than x number of points to be eligible for the open game as opposed to the non life master or limited game then we may be asking wrong question.
Jan. 27, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think the question is flawed since their are many players who play at clubs for any years but do not play in open duplicate games. I know of one local club where the limited game went up to 1000 points and was being discussed to go to 1500.
Jan. 26, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No different at a Regional where the top bracket one day pays significantly different another day based on who is in event.

Concept is each day they will bracket the filed into different events based on strength of field. No different than bracketed events today. The different is bracketed at club level as opposed to putting players in different bracket.
Jan. 26, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Melanie. I play a Wes. night game in my local area. Only night game there is. I work during the days. I would not consider if they had a night time event that I would drive the hours plus to play another night game during the same week. However I would consider taking an afternoon off to play both a Friday and a Saturday. Since I believe the majority of ACBL clubs play during the day I'm not sure running one at night makes sense at this time.
Jan. 26, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If more in the bridge world would think
“what's best for bridge” as opposed to
“what's best for me” the bridge world would be a better place.
This goes for all the things that we discuss
Jan. 26, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
43,182 members have less than 30 masterpoints. Not sure what question is trying to get to. I expect most players may play on line in team games as practice as opposed to playing in ACBL tournaments. I have about 135 online ACBL points. Played more online when work/family did not allow me to attend as many tournaments as I like. Last year 0 points on line but was in the top 500. Don't see anything wrong in ACBL exploring other avenues to promote bridge.
Jan. 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The problem I see if x is considered a compatible call and opener had AKJx Qxxx Axx xx I would expect a heart call since they know they have a heart fit but may not have a spade fit.
Jan. 15, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Jeff, I believe email numbers was number of college teams entered in the collegiate so far this year and the number of youth K-12 courses that ACBL subsidizes. Why would you think numbers aren't correct. Now if you have programs not requesting subsidies from ACBL then I would suggest you give them info to get the subsidy they are entitled to.
Dec. 31, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Stop making my partner frown.
Dec. 31, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1.) Not the creator but I would expect to give a reason for people to play more bridge.
2.) Expect non ACBL what you don't win money?? You win points.
3.) encourage people to play more bridge. Give in incentive to get better
Dec. 31, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I did look at tournament form Fargo and I can see. Seems like the factor for open pairs which was set to 3X the number of tables which was done to limit the award so when 15 tables in open and 100 tables in gold rush didn't want an award for 115 tables.

However on Saturday with 10.5 tables in open and only 4.5 in Gold Rush to give credit for 30 tables seems wrong.

Seems like in attempt to minimize award in some tournaments increased too much in others.

Hate to say it since may hurt attendance since some players vastly prefer one format versus another but seems like with small tournament need to minimize the number of different open options available.
Dec. 31, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Peg, I have not seen this bid of a disparity in Florida Regional tournaments but could see the case if team game is small enough. Maybe 1st, 2nd in pairs only grater than 2 session team game. I do see this to some extent in sectionals where 1 session pair games pay more than 2 session teams mostly since they get significantly more tables.
Dec. 31, 2017
.

Bottom Home Top