Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Kevin Barnes
1 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I posted this as a sanity check on a ruling. W tanked for a long time (maybe a minute) before passing. The ruling of score stands appears to imply that E had no logical alternative….to the double he chose! Result was -1 rather than -2 on misdefence.
Feb. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
15-17, I believe
Feb. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
On the substance, many have commented better than I could. I was broadly aware of the dilemmas you faced. In fact, knowing you planned to play the third quarter on Friday I even asked a work colleague what he would do in your circumstances. But I wasn't aware of the complex intra-team dynamics. In the circumstances it was even more impressive that you were both able to shrug it off and play near your best.

Thanks for the comment re conventions. I was going to protest that in my longstanding partnership with Chris Miller (limited for the past several years by his directing commitments and my family responsibilities) I play a complex strong club system in which virtually everything is alertable, lots of things are inverted, and nothing is what it says on the tin. But then I realized that the system is based on Barry Rigal's (literally) dated “Precision in the Nineties” and that didn't get me off the hook for being “old-fashioned”…
Oct. 11, 2018
Kevin Barnes edited this comment Oct. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think the suggestion is that Law 73 B1 was breached.
Oct. 7, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I have to say I thought that was really gutsy. I wondered what you would do in that third stanza given the state of the match and the stakes at play. As it was you played one more stanza than your counterpart in each of the last three matches. Really glad it worked out. Congratulations to all!
Oct. 7, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Do the implications of an early discard of the 7D need to be disclosed in response to questions on carding?
April 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
So now we have a full list of entrants for the BW Fantasy Vanderbilt Brackets can we choose to withdraw? Entrants include one LF…..
March 15, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It would be helpful if, once you have gone online and found the form it was possible to fill it in electronically. And even better if one of the recorder's e-mail addresses was current..
Aug. 9, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The problem was that North took about 2 minutes to bid 3NT, but there was ruled to be no logical alternative to South's jump to 6C!
Sept. 15, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“And kudos to Judy Gartaganis of Canada who is the only woman still playing in the Open Teams. ”

Kudos to Judy indeed, but I think you'll find that Frances Hinden is still playing on the England Open team…
Sept. 9, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
From the OP: “However, to a large extent it is up to the players to keep our game clean. They know when they are being cheated. It is their duty to tell their captain, who may advise his concerns to the chief tournament director. It is preferable for the players to avoid confrontation at the table, for they have enough work to do. Better to leave it to the NPCs. Finally, let there be no mistake: The WBF will do whatever it takes to bring cheats to justice and it will enforce the penalties defined in the Laws without fear or favour”


From the(unapproved) minutes of the English Bridge Union Selection Committee meeting of June 8 2016 : “Jeremy Dhondy had reminded Gianarrigo Rona he had not received a reply to his letter regarding the alleged cheating in the Seniors event. David Harris had responded that investigations had been made but there was not enough evidence to pursue the matter. Jeremy will reply to David that that neither the player involved or the NPC of the team had been asked to give any evidence.”

Anyone discern a disconnect?
Sept. 4, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The as-yet-unapproved minutes of the English Bridge Union Board meeting of June 28 posted on the EBU website note that:

“JD circulated a letter which he had received from the WBF in response to a formal complaint which had been made at the 2015 World Championships regarding perceived ethical violations by an opposing pair. JD expressed his disappointment at the response from the WBF.”
Aug. 18, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I also learned multi about 30 years ago in England, but learning how to defend against it in those pre-internet days was a little more difficult. It took me about two years to find a book that had a defence (Dixon)in it. Maybe I should have directly asked one of my opponents…..

I am now probably unusual in the US in that I play almost exclusively in events (the Washington Bridge League unit game) that do allow midchart conventions (albeit not midchart6-and hence multi- in sectional pair games). However,if I am playing with a non-regular partner, the mid-chart pre-alert is certainly helpful to ensure we will be on the same wavelength on defence for example to transfer responses to one club. If these conventions are to become GCC it would be helpful to have a transitional and educational period to enable players to become familiar with effective defences.
May 15, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I liked this and it is one of my pet peeves too.

But what if the Director wants to poll BW on logical alternatives and it faces an injunction or chooses to install a new server?
April 5, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The article states that “Fisher, in an e-mail to me, claims that he only helped No Matter”. Which is at a minimum admitting at least some involvement.

March 1, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The Washington Bridge League has an ombudsman, appointed by the President with the approval of the Board, who is “authorized to discuss with the Unit game director, Sectional director-in charge, or the Board all issues raised by the membership pertaining to directors.”

As far as I can tell this system seems to work well.
Feb. 26, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My experience is that even if you know the rules, and while your opponents may be subject to penalty, you won't receive any benefit unless you're damaged.

An example came up in a (GCC) NAP Flight B final many years ago, when opponents overcalled our no trump with a (then midchart) 2D showing a single suiter in either major. The (very experienced) directors chose not to penalize the opponents since they had forgotten to announce at the start that it was a GCC event.

They also took the view that we had not been damaged. In fact and more arguably they even commented when called immediately after the bid, that it would take a lot to convince them of possible damage, since they knew I often played against the bid in the (midchart) unit game.
Feb. 25, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Couldn't opener have five spades?
Nov. 7, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Of course, the steadfastly amateur 19th century Corinthians side would not only act as Dan suggested, taking off one of their own players if the opposition went a man down, but would also deliberately not score from penalties, which would have been “ungentlemanly.” I did once play against their modern day descendants Corinthian Casuals, but they seem to have abandoned these customs.
Oct. 29, 2015
Kevin Barnes edited this comment Oct. 29, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Not all online games are robot best-hand games..
Sept. 8, 2015
1 2
.

Bottom Home Top