Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Lauritz Streck
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If West splits I could just win, cash A and Q and ruff a heart. If he doesn't win there are 10 tricks, otherwise he'll have to play a club at trick 11. Somehow I wouldn't have too many other choices if he had split.
April 4, 2017
Lauritz Streck edited this comment April 4, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I tried adding a diagram with the sequence of play on the first hand. I haven't found a tool to generate the play with the mighty “Next” button so I tried it by hand. Does anyone know what's wrong with this code? {handviewer d=w&v=0&n=saq3hkq52dj74cakt&s=sjt964hj8dk2c8732&p=dad4d8d2d6d7d9dksjs2s3s8s4s5sqd3h2h4hjh9h8h3hkhadqs6d5djc2c4}
April 4, 2017
Lauritz Streck edited this comment April 5, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
At the table this hand passed and partner has Q AKDxxxx Axx xx, -650 instead of -300. Should He have bid his hand differently or is this just the price to pay for Petting pressure on the opponents in 3rd hand and having wide-ranging preempts there?
April 4, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Would you have bid 5 last round then? Sorry for the delayed editing.
March 14, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Kit Woolsey even advocated redoubling with a normal overcall in the Same situation (playing I think the blue ribbon Pairs) on the Basis that the (even top notch) opponents might not know there agreements in one of his articles, so having a misunderstanding here certainly isn't uncommon.
Sept. 14, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thank you for writing this series! It really gives new and fascinating insights on the way to think at the table with every article.
One question to the content though: What would South do with a huge hand and no clear direction over 4? After all East might just be fooling around, even though that's unlikely in this specific situation. But I guess Likelihood doesn't really mesh well with firm agreements.
So could you please explain when after your agreements Double of an artificial call by an unpassed hand is lead-directing and when it is Take-out?
Aug. 20, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My mistake, I hope that won't change the votes too badly
July 20, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I guess I'm definitely not spoiling the hand for anyone still thinking about the problem now, so here are the results from the table:
The West Hand was:

K
10xxx
xxxxx
Dxx

East had

xxxxx
xx
Bxx
xxx

I followed the endplay-line Marc suggested above by cashing the hearts, ruffing a diamond, drawing trumps, cashing AK and KQ before exiting with a club.
As you can see that was remarkably successful. I still see West recounting the hand before cashing her diamond with an air of astonishment.
Thanks to everyone who took the time to think about the best line in this problem!
June 15, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
With this Line you have the extra Chance that someone may discard his “idle fifth” in Diamonds. It seems almost impossible that an opponent will pitch two spades from say

Kxx
xx
Bxxxx
Qxx

after seeing his Partners second card in Diamonds and thus probably knowing that you have only four
May 6, 2016
.

Bottom Home Top