Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Paul D East
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 58 59 60 61
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't understand the votes for 3. It was not stated that 2 was a transfer, so I assume 2 is natural.
49 minutes ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
How can we answer if we dont know if 3 is forcing?
52 minutes ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Totally agree.
3 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
On an aside, I do not like pass then 3 byWest.
6 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
4. We may be too high, but we will reach the correct suit he said hopefully.
6 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Almost voted for option but when I read RF's comment I realized I would also bid 2 on that hand.
Oct. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Whether there was an infraction by West repeatedly bidding clubs depends on how many clubs West had an how many hearts West had.

If West had, say 11 clubs and a heart void, probably no infraction.

If West had seven clubs and three hearts, I would say West took advantage of the alert and used UI.

Situation a bit different if screens in use.
Oct. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Agree with Dominic
Oct. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I would be scared to death to bid 3. 4 itself is an underbid. 3 has merit.
Oct. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree there is UI.
Oct. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Partner passed 1?
Oct. 15
Paul D East edited this comment Oct. 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Passing 3 is wrong even when its right.
Oct. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I would consider 1-2 playing SJS. If not, surely worth 3 last time as JD and KD have noted. As it is, I have no good bid.
Oct. 13
Paul D East edited this comment Oct. 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
North should have waited until the auction ended. Explain what the agreement is. Tell the opponents they may want to call the director.

He definitely should not say anything until the auction is over.
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Opener did lead A but it was from Ax
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Partner's hand

Q7 Q9863 KQJ105 10

Fortunately no diamond ruff.
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
FWIW, at the table I came to the same conclusion as RF and bid 6.
Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think you have consensus.
Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Always worth torturing partner.
Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Not vulnerable I open almost all 11 hcp hands. Except for 4th seat.
Oct. 11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 58 59 60 61
.

Bottom Home Top