All comments by Ralph F. Lind
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
P.M.Jr. - Done.

I recall reading an article by Mike Lawrence about the range for a 1NT response by partner in this particular situation. Sometime in the last few years. Might've been in the ACBL Bulletin.

As I remember, Mike advocated a ~ 4-10 1NT response. Perhaps someone else remembers seeing it?

As it has bearing on this auction, it might be of interest to run a range poll.

~ 8-10
~ 7-10
~ 6-10
~ 5-10
~ 4-10
~ 3-10

9 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Excusez-moi… showing a void with exclusion responses
12 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Who has the Ace?

I would try 4 EKC.
17 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
C.Za - “”Pass“ puts a lot of pressure on partner who will then not know we have a fit…”

Agree… but does an immediate 4 call gain or lose probabilistic advantage?
17 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sarik - What does The Law tell you to do?
June 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
- deleted, wrong post
June 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“How does the Law help you in the play of 3♣ doubled when dummy hits with a 4=3=4=2 shape (17 total trumps) and no entry but sufficient defence to hold spades to 7 tricks, for example Q10xx xxx J10xx xx?”

Only a singleton K helps. Probability 12.5%
June 10
Ralph F. Lind edited this comment June 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Trump estimate

East 4 s
West 4-5 s
North 7 s
South 1-3 s

Estimated total trumps 16-19

THE LAW using the lowest guess of 16 total trumps…

if 2 is making 8 tricks (-110) then 2 is also making 8 tricks (+90) and 3 will be down a trick (-100). THE LAW says you must bid 3 in this situation.

if 2 is making 7 tricks (+50) then 2 is making 9 tricks (+110) and 3 will also be (+110). THE LAW says you must bid 3 in this situation.

THE LAW using Kieran's estimate of 17 total trumps…

if 2 is making 8 tricks (-110) then 2 is making 9 tricks (+110) and 3 will also be (+110). THE LAW says you must bid 3 in this situation.

if 2 is making 7 tricks (+50) then 2 is making 10 tricks (+130) and 3 will also be (+130). THE LAW says you must bid 3 in this situation.
June 9
Ralph F. Lind edited this comment June 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
R.F. - “how is anyone supposed to know how many total trumps there are here?”

Use an estimated number, not a for sure number.
June 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Since the 876 were bookended and the odds were 2:1 against the K10 being doubleton, Zia shoulda pushed the 5, a humble Lullaby card.
June 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Y.T. - What does the Law tell you to do?
June 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The reason you bid 5NT pick-a-slam (over 4) is to find out if partner likes his s well enough to suggest playing in 6.

If that is the case, you are going to take a shot at a big cross-IMP swing and bid 7.

You did it this way because (in a contract) the hand does not require opener to have second round control. All it needs is for h/she to take a ruff in dummy.
June 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
L.H. - I agree, its for a lead.

Richard brings up conflicting indications.

This calls into question West's Redouble. Is it “strength” or is it “just kidding”? The only clue is partner pulling to 4.
June 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
C.Za. - this hand reminds me of another fine Pacific N.W. player, the late Bob Hitchens. Without fail, Hitchens always jumped to Game in this situation. Today… I'll follow suit.
June 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
L.H. - how did you read West's double of 3NT?
June 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Do you trust the opponents to have 9 ♠s between them and your partner to have shortness?”

No!

“do you just bash 7, or something else/ what?”

No! … this is the right question, Don.

You want to make a bid which will lead you to guess if there's a good probability of finding a parking place for those 2 small s.
May 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Win the J, Ace, and K.

Cross ruff until they ruff in with Ace, J or 7.

ruff the 9 with the 5.
lead 3 up to the Ace, then ruff the 5 with the 6.

If all that worked, we have 6 tricks. And we still have 5 of the top 7 trump together with the Ace.

Continue to cross ruff until they ruff in with Ace or J.

lead the 2 and ruff it with the 8, then ruff the 7 with the 10.

etc …
May 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'd be curious as to how people think West should bid their hand.

4NT was fine as long as it's forcing.
May 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Any balanced hand with 19 HCP containing 4 Aces should open 2NT when playing for stakes.

https://bridgewinners.com/article/view/bidding-problem-2-w3qm75l8kp/?cj=705088#c705088
May 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Why would partner bid this way?”

No entry for a Notrump Slam. He/she expects you to correct to 6NT or 7NT with a stiff club.
May 8
.

Bottom Home Top