Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Ralph Letizia
1 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Steve is right on target here and is not being biased in favor of District 11. I have been involved with this tournament since its conception days. The fact that it is at a casino is a very attractive option for our ACBL gambling contingent. The only downside in my option, is that smoking is allowed virtually everywhere except the playing area, and unless there have been recent changes, even the restuarants have a smoking section. A casino cannot afford to turn away smokers. An additional perk is there is easy free parking onsite.
4 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Nice job Gaylor! Gives an old guy like me hope I may yet win another one.
July 29
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Now THAT looks like fun! Some interesting innovations there. Thanks for sharing.
July 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thank you. Beats the copy and paste I now use.
June 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This is not a simple scenario. Opening one no trump may get you to a close game. Opening 1D makes it more difficult. If 2D makes and 1N is down - so what? Maybe they can make 2 of a major? This is why I don't play with unreasonable people and it doesn't have to be a spouse. Playing precision I can open 1D and jump to 3D. Playing 2/1 I think I am in a quandary and it is not easy to visualize where we are going beyond 2D. But neither bid is absolutely correct - as they say so often in the legal world, “it depends”.
April 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thank Yu! (thank you Yu sounds weird…). However, bridge on a high level does create enough physiological stress to be considered exertion. So far, I do not believe anyone has given a credible argument why bridge should be an Olympic sport. Be satisfied being the best of a small niche and quit worrying about receiving a medal. I can just see a group of biathlon medal winners in a bar “discussing” the bridge medal winners at the next table. And who will win the inevitable bar fight? ;-)
March 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I support Mr. Zolotow 100%. As a strong performer in several “real” sports, I totally agree that bridge, along with all of its close relatives, is a game. While I admire the temerity of those trying to justify bridge as a sport, it appears to me that the real reason is to gain the ego gratification of being seen as participating in an Olympic sport. Apparently just being an outstanding performer in the most difficult card game in history is not enough. Let's face it - even Jeff and Eric are probably never going to grace the front of a Wheaties box.
March 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I can relate to the “You hold…” feeling, however, I always hold my breath hoping it is a bidding or opening lead problem. While they may not all be Michael's level, all experts see to play and defend equally well most of the time. I can't say the same for bidding or opening leads though.
Feb. 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thank you Michael! That was a beautiful analysis, and that's how world par contests are won(ref: Bridge Today magazine).

I'll never forget the first time I saw The Way It Is in a mid or late 70's(I think that's right) Bridge World. Thay led to a lifelong fascination with the game and from that point forward, I could not get enough of the game. And thanks to such books as Adventures in Card Play and Killing Defense, there were tons of both learning options and entertainment.

Now, if only we could play against a field of chthonics rather than humans. I suspect we'd all get better or give up the game.
Feb. 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree 100% with Steve. Clubs are supposed to be a training ground and we should be allowed to practice any acceptable tactics that would be allowed without question in a sanctioned tournament. That having been said, clubs can do whatever they like including banning such bidding, and pretty much anyone they want as long as it is not for bias. Since the conception of online bridge, do we really care if we can or cannot play in a club game (possibly the possible exception of NAOP? Finally, are inexperienced players not there to learn or are they there just for a social gathering? When I was an “inexperienced player, there was a terrible convention played called the Woodson Two Way NT. It was really abused, but They justified the abuse as ”tactical“, so even if the pair(s) had been playing together for 20 years, there was no recourse. I spent my time learning how to beat these guys and not complaining about their ”tactical" bidding.
Sept. 18, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
While I 100% agree with this, I'd also like use to be limited to higher level games with no masterpoint restriction.
April 27, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
????
April 17, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hmmmm, selling oneself to rich old ladies? What exactly are we selling? Oh, and you left out synchronized swimming.
Feb. 7, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Excellent suggestion Yu, however, we should target games that have a more social environment. I actually left high-level chess to play bridge - it was not a happy place.
Feb. 7, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Now that warms my heart. I was an avid MTG player back in the day and oft times wondered if any of these guys played bridge. Never saw anyone I recognized though.
Feb. 6, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What's wrong with Des Moines? Very centralized and accessible to most people, and probably cheaper than Hawaii. I'd go there.
Jan. 15, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Steve, thanks for sharing. It was quite enlightening. I guess I am old school but I play a pass shows any 0-4 (if 4, not an A). Double is 4-7 (if 4, must be an A). I don't try to get a perfect result when the opponents interfere over 1C (which they almost always do). +200 vs +100 at IMPs should not be too significant whereas +200 vs +600 in 3N is, and is easier to reach if partner limits their hand early. Just being pragmatic here.
Nov. 13, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Emily, I am really loving this. Thanks for the effort!
Nov. 13, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Forever have, and always will hate that “level of player” business. This is a very basic and fundamental bridge problem, yet, quite a few will not realize the unblocking play or at least explicitly. But I totally agree that a thorough claim explanation must be given regardless of how rudimentary the play may appear to declarer. In a similar mode, the world is full of bad claims where declarer did not say, “pulling trumps” and an opponent eventually got a ruff. Finally, even experts have brain farts at times and make bad plays or claims albeit it is usually due to heavy fatigue. But sorry, that excuse or the fact that they are an expert does not get a pass from me.
Nov. 6, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I expect partner to bid with a weakish 5-5 or better, so by passing the decision to me, I believe they are willing to sit for a penalty double (assuming a double actually is penalty). This is an excellent matchpoint problem.
Oct. 11, 2017
1 2
.

Bottom Home Top