Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Rezo Jinjikhashvili
1 2 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
37 is the number I was given (as presented) both in IBF and EBL out of 64 boards NS 37 defense :) , but as promised although not in allegation I will go through the rest and tell you my opinion :)
March 24, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Nicolas
Ofcourse I am Biased.
Because I remember most of placements if not all of them and the hands.
I will explain it again why: if I hear a score of a board from another table, I call TD, and tell him I have heared the board.
Instead I could assume I am not biased and just try play the board by “what would I do if didn't hear” Since I know I can't I call TD and tell him I have heared and I can't be unbiased anymore :(
Human nature, I am very honest but still can't help the fact that I know the result and I refuse to play the board, as well as here I refuse to take the challenge :)
March 24, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi, I have made a poll long time ago (participents not named)
If you want I will tell you the results. Me? I know the boards. Imagine same hand 2 different questions:
1. “What would you bid?”
2. “What would you bid to get to 6?”
I think even the biggest experts may answer differently, me? Probably. It's just how it works :(
March 24, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The better question IMHO would be why didn't you Richard help the allegation and put the matches you think should be there as well?
March 18, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Richard what you are saying is wrong!
By asked I mean allegation documents! There is set of matches that allegation presented. I go through that particular set!
Example: aleegation says person A killed person B you check and say, I think he didn't.
But then Richard comes and says, but person A killed person C why didn't you check that?
Answer: wasn't in allegation!
March 18, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Adriano
Why don't you just say what out of things that were done you believe is wrong?
Explain the math, BTW I am always open for debates live on skype, with witnesses if you want, are you?
March 18, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Well more and more insults coming, it is unfortunate:(
Although not unexpected. It is unfortunate that in 21st century still for fairly expressing objective view you can be insulted.
I think that shows lack of inteligence by itself.
When you can't say anything inteligent just insult a person it may work :(
March 18, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Dear Gonzalo
I wish you would know me a little better.
I assure you other than the fact that I inproved my bridge because of this and wasted much time no other compansation was there. I have no problem answering any questions regarding that.
BTW you can direct those questions to me:)
March 18, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Dear Richard
To evaluate evidence given I looked at evidence given.
Allegation presents evidence I evaluate.
Simple as that.
I am not a detective and not pretend to be.
All I did is analyze the evidence presented.
Why do I need to find out what happened elsewhere if I am not supposed to neither by allegation nor by defence? Can please explain? Oppinion is not on whether they cheated or not!
I am not mind reader and if you would listen to video I said it many times it takes lot of time and effort to look at all the videos which I often times not have. So I concentrate my efforts on what was presented to me by allegation!
I will say it again to count numbers you are presented you don't need other numbers. If they would ask me “please Rezo find out if they cheated for us” I would say no! I don't have time.
Everything I claimed I did! So please don't try to say I have claimed something I did not really do.

“It takes real chutzpah to provide expert testimony after such a half assed effort…” Really? I have put A huge effort in what I did but ONLY in what I claimed I did !
I give you credit of 1 of the 2, either you haven't watched/heared
what I said or you don't understand hebrew(other than chutzpah)
and nobody translated to you!
March 17, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Richard, Excelent I wish I would have them :)
March 17, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Dear Adriano
I probably am not as genius as you are would you elaborate what exactly do you want me to do? You want me to assume 1 out 4 odds and cheeck how accurate I am? That is a wrong check! For many reasons, if you tell me to do something wrong than no thanks I don't have that much time :)
March 17, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Oh I didn't know they existed or were available, hopefully also sunday :)
March 17, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks again Greg
I will probably do that on Sunday.
Since that is the day I have to really dedicate to something like that.

P.S.
Your inteligent comments are refreshing:)
March 17, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks for your replies.
Greg I am trying to go through the other videos too it takes time eventually I will.
Adriano 1 out 4 chance is not entirely correct, and the math isn't that simple, if at any time you want to know why please contact me and we can have a skype call :)
March 17, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Adriano
I think I have a few clues why are people thinking they have cheated, thanks for your point.
1. Why does it happened that when we see somebody on trial for mass murder, or rape of 10 women, or pedofile, most of us assume that the person is guilty and the trial is just for protocol and only if the lawyer, or some witnesses lie the defendent can “escape the punishment that he deserves”. Why? because when we hear from the media those allegations we are automatically disgusted and are against that person, because we see the victims, photos, videos and other.
2. Because of their past, they had somewhat shady past as children. Although they were very young.
3. Some of their behavior(in my case it was Lotan) makes you not like them and when you don't like somebody it's easier to accept the guilt.
4. They are winning! At a very young age still and this doesn't happen very often.
5. And last but not least they are too active at the table, do lot's of non game related stuff, that don't characterize most of other pairs.
The more “active” people are that more variables they create to gather statistics. In their case there are more then enough.
People like to be good and acceptable, most of the people that comment or conclude(possibly not you) don't go through the evidence at all and form their oppinion from what other people say.
I myself was afraid and took my time before speking out because it is not easy to do a thing when you expect lot's of negative comments directed to you and people automatically think you are Devil's advocate, but I still did this, because I believe in looking at both sides of the coin.

March 17, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks Greg :)
March 17, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Adriano
I don't think “honest” or “dishonest” is black and white, maybe “careless” or “mistaken” :)
That is why I say when we talk about the future of other people we need to be very careful :)
March 17, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry if I miss understood, I thought John said:
“Your contention that the strike rate of short leads against notrump contracts is preposterous, if a pair never makes a poor lead, according to you, that is not indicative of illicit communication. I'm sorry but that is exactly what others will rightfully conclude.”
Meaning that there is some kind of stats indicating F/S hit on target much more than the others. If this wasn't what you meant I apologize. :)
March 17, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
lol
Good 1 guys :D
March 17, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi again
1. Yes, I agree, code breaking probably not a must if you have Several irrational behavior(lead, play or defense) with high success rate.
2.If no, but their are still thoughts that a given pair(any pair) is/has been cheating, then code breaking is probably necessary.
3.What really is a fine here? Career in bridge? I think yes.
Outside of bridge? Possibly yes as well. Would you hire cheaters?
I wouldn't. So in my opinion people that play bridge at high levels probably can/could have bright career outside of bridge as well, in all kind of fields that require analytical thinking and other features that are required from world class bridge player.
I am pretty confident that pairs that have been convicted in cheating would rather pay high fine than long term ban.
My point is that the punishment is very high so we need to be very careful in these kind of decisions.

March 17, 2016
1 2 3
.

Bottom Home Top