Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Robert Leese
1 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That certainly creates more options for a hand like this, but we were playing simple Michaels, so my options were more limited.
Without agreed upon special methods, I think the respondents' choice of 1S is best, trusting to be able to take further appropriate action.
Sept. 27
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 in my system would mean H's and S's, so would have misled P too much. 1S seems to be best, with a fuller description to follow.
Sept. 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I actually agree with you. When putting the question into BW, I just didn't see how to get the vote prior to providing the synopsis. It was more a way of soliciting an opinion on a rare hand (my last one color hand was 35+ years ago) than getting a completely objective survey, so I apologize for that. What was/is most curious to me is the difference in soliciting opinions from A-level players in the “warmth” of the moment verbally between sessions at the tournament and visually here. Here, 1S is the overwhelming winner (and I agree the correct bid, as there is really no hurry, or definitive way, to convey your extreme shape) in the survey. At the tournament, people either deferred with a “what did you bid?” inquiry on their face or bid 4S or X. Only one pro (one of the calmest, most analytic I know) said 1S without reservation, citing the possible adverse S breaks and no need to be in a hurry. Most foresaw the difficulty in getting to 6 in either black suit on hands that would make it (as was the case) & felt 4S the most likely end result, however. The general approach of proceeding slowly when the hand belongs to you at the game or slam level again appears best here. Thanks for your input.
Sept. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks. Interesting treatment and possibilities from it.
Sept. 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That might've worked well here, with all roads leading to 4S, or perhaps more bidding could've helped you and P to decide whether to leave X of 5d in. I wish I had written the hand down or could remember the H's in the hand but time constraints and the H's being immaterial to my contract kept me from so doing. RHO may have gotten to mention H's, but if pushed, on the actual layout of the cards 6S makes, so your method works well in the majority of cases with this hand, I think.
Sept. 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'm a bit late to this forum, but (except for the table experiences) second everything Robin said above.
Sept. 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
At the table, I elected to bid the game I felt was most likely to make, 4S, with the realization that I might miss a slam, but after the opening bid and missing SK,CK,CQ I felt 2 losers were likely. 1S has a lot to be said for it, as the hand is not likely to be passed out after that, & it leaves the most room for exploration. Any Blackwood will have the problem of whether values are duplicated or even necessary, and location of SK, CK & CQ along with whether you can get to partner's hand. Double would mis-describe your hand, but that may not be bad as long as you just followup with an appropriate # of S's or C's. At the other table, N bid 4S, followed by 5D, X, P and S bid 5S. S had 6D's to the K-10. SK was offside, but P had K-x of C's with both black suits breaking evenly so both declarers made 6S's. It was my first completely 2-suited hand since 1984 and it went for a push, which in retrospect is about what I should've expected. 5D X'd by E would've been down at least 2, but need 3 for a profit and I forget the rest of the hand. Suggested bidding path for a (somewhat) anti-percentage 6S or 6C's?
Sept. 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'm not wild about bidding anything here without knowing more about opps 4441 agreement and the doubling agreements, but the X's would both be takeout-oriented in my partnerships, so I old my nose and bid the lowest place with which my partner may agree. Given the usual responses & F/U bids to MiniRoman, P is more likely to have a m than M. I agree with Richard that X of 2H (responsive-like) may very well have done our partnership the most good - I have H's & as much as P can expect, so why not tell him? It could backfire if opener had 4H's, but P should then be short there & know something's amiss.
Feb. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That also works fine in IMP's, and it can still be converted to 7NT in MP play.
May 23, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I bid 3S but I think it really comes down to whether it is easier to obtain forgiveness for bidding this from your partner afterwards or permission to be so aggressive ahead of time. If your partner is a strict by-the-booker, P is going to be a lot more harmonious.
May 17, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Given your agreements, which would also be mine with most partners, I see nothing wrong with 3D, which accurately describes your shape. Partner is going to bid again, you appear misfit in spite of your HCP, and 3N may be the best strain if P bids it. Pass whatever game he bids. I don't see any hurry to try to steer to any strain yourself.
May 17, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Playing standard NegX and 1S, one does indeed curse the bridge gods(demons?) with this hand. I hate to pass just because there is no good bid, but that was my vote here. The weak NT comment below is noteworthy. It may be whoever wins this auction gets the negative score.
May 14, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1N in a romp. 'bots at times are less than predictable - like partners!
May 13, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Matt, knowing you and your regular partner through my play in the same clubs, I do not believe you should have been elevated to the “A” strata for the reasons you state, even though I believe you both play significantly above your MP rating (the only rationale the director could have in your case, to my knowledge). While this might serve the purpose of making more “C” players eligible for MP's, it would discriminate against you and your partner in the rightful accumulation of yours, and thus not be fair to you. This seems to be your assessment of what happened. I would be happy to discuss it with you in person at your convenience since, knowing the directors as well, I can not understand why this occurred.
May 13, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks for your post. Your 3rd paragraph above states a point I was bringing up in my reply to Steve above more directly than I did.
May 13, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks, Steve. Never knew what's in your last sentence, but it makes sense, since some clubs in D25 have players of considerable ability from foreign countries whose “MP's” are not recognized by the ACBL.
May 13, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Jay, on the suggested SJS auction, with opener rebidding 3S, 4NT by responder should elicit a 5S (2 with) or 5N (even with a void) response from opener. With the given responder hand, I agree completely that bidding 7S OR 7N would not only be indicated but expected. If responder just bid 6N, as opener, I would have trouble accepting his decision to stop there and not bid 7S (he did,after all, initiate RKC after S's). If he wanted to correct to 7N, fine, as I don't know about his source of outside tricks, or understand, like you, why he didn't just bid it himself over 5N.
May 13, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That would work, with a bit of angst, playing strong jump shifts. Not as good a story, though.:)
May 12, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Robin, as usual, your input is insightful, and probably the single best reason for 2S being the best, and most popular choice. It is wrong for defense, but today's style is to “take up” action rather than “go quietly” into the goodnight of letting opps play unchallenged 2M contracts.
May 5, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I did think you were only discussing the breakpoints. I can think of no justification for what you describe, so, knowing the directors at the club, I can only conclude it was a mistake. Absent the director's input, I can't comment further.
May 5, 2017
1 2
.

Bottom Home Top