Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Sartaj Hans
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16 17 18 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Adjust the score to -490, give EW a procedural penalty and give South a smack on the head !
Dec. 16, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks folks. Anyone aware of format for : Poland, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden ?
Dec. 13, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I was sympathetic to rehabilitation of cheaters. I think you present a persuasive case.
Being banned from playing bridge is not like spending your life in jail.

There needs to be a strong deterrent.
Dec. 12, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Kit, It is impressive how you manage to be such a prolific publisher. I was busy congratulating myself on quickly spotting running the D9, but your analysis shows how it is actually a mistake (at least on paper). 6=2=3=2 East and the D are 3-3 and 7=2=2=2 you make on the other line you demonstrate.
Great hand and thanks again for continuing to generate such fantastic material !
Nov. 5, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A very logical proposal. Urge the authorities to take action.
Oct. 13, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Agree.
Sept. 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks.
Sept. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Jan,
Thanks for posting this. Is there a web link to view the list of entries to date?
Sartaj
Sept. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“O. Wait. You DID misunderstand.”
How little you understand, Mike D. Wiss
July 26, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Enjoyed it !
July 13, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
There is no need to vilify the player in question or question his intent.

The director should change the score and award a procedural penalty.

The culture will automatically get better.
June 21, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Since the diamond continuation is a LA, it must be required.” Agree
March 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A win for the legal process, a loss for the truth. A casualty of modern times.
Jan. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Look forward to it !
Dec. 16, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This gets more and more juicy everyday !
Dec. 12, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I disagree with the purported complexity of the goal of bidding.

The goal of bidding is to have the best possible score.

If one can simulate a range of scenarios and accurately apply appropriate weights and evaluations to them, any bridge bidding action (in theory) should be quantifiable.

My view is that terms like preemption, bidding for the lead, constructive bidding are just useful for didactic value. They are not philosophical cornerstones of the game; they are just terms for human understanding and expression.

The language of data-driven computers is different. It does not require such terms.
Nov. 25, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think we ought to view this opening bid structure as an early iteration of the optimal design (for a computer program). Especially when they are looking at uncontested auctions only.
Nov. 23, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Fascinating. Thanks for sharing. I am not a techie in the space but the key takeaway for me is:
They have designed a program that learns bidding strategy without any programmed human knowledge.

As a parallel story, chess featured decades of improvement through coding human knowledge into computer systems. This eventually led to Deep Blue defeating Garry Kasparov, the world's best chess player in a close match. Even though the victory was commonly ascribed to Deep Blue's tremendous processing power, the human coding of the evaluation function and opening strategy played a key role in the computer's victory. Since then, the trend has changed. The top chess program now learn by themselves. Matches between top chess computers and humans are no longer close.

Also, I understand that the recent demolition of human players in Go was by a program using deep learning, i.e. no human input into strategy as well.
Nov. 23, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Love your articles !
Oct. 13, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Great to hear its all come together! Look forward to watching it in the Oz screening :)
July 23, 2017
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16 17 18 19
.

Bottom Home Top