Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Scott Needham
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You asked what 1H-3m would've been….
Feb. 26, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
In reference to your comment: “The only hard bid is what if partner bids 4?? Does he have a bad-preference, or a limit raise? An understanding partner knows to bid 5? here to show the limit raise (which I will raise to 6).”

Bergen is on. But consider the 1N response: Assume that this partner would've raised to 5H with the 3-card LR, but there are other good (but poorish) hands that she could hold, aren't there? Suppose it goes 1H-(P)-1N-(3S)//4C-(P)-4H or 1H-(P)-1N-(3S)//X-(P)-4H: Now what? Do you make a try or doncha?
Feb. 25, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For a flexible approach to weak 2s, look for “Trent weak two-bids.” Granovetters gave this structure some legs in their conventions book.
Feb. 21, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For the 3S bidders: I'm curious whether there is any 5-card suit you would not overcall here. Or do you feel it is just to dangerous not to mention the Ss? There have been several of these higher-level unfav vul/bad suit/overcall problems, and the overcallers are usually as numerous as the passers.
Feb. 12, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Kit: What do you think of some version of Mohan in terms of versatility?
Feb. 8, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think partner was weak, so bid 1N, but with 6-7 Ds and couldn't help him/herself.
Feb. 7, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1D followed by 3 K-S D. I just like K-S minor structures….
Feb. 7, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I play WNT whenever possible, so I understand that a “value showing” double is integral to a defense. I'm hoping someone can persuasively clear up one issue: the size of the doubling hand. Most authority says 15; significant authority says “top of range”; I always thought “good exemplar of same hand” was best, since it comes up more frequently. I'm told that Meckwell, at least at some point, played the latter. What's the skinny?
Feb. 7, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1H-1S/2S-4C*/4D-4H/4N-5N**/6S. 1S response b/c “go slow” looks right. 4C spl for S b/c responder knows about the double fit and any H bid is murky, without a gadget, after the 1S response. (** = 2+void)
Feb. 6, 2013
Scott Needham edited this comment Feb. 6, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Greg: OK, this feature solves the problem of how to follow comments to a bidding problem. But how do I pare the lists of favorites? Must I go to the article and then “unlike” it? Seems it would be better if there were an icon opposite each topic on the favorites list that could be chosen for “unlike” (equivalent to “unhearting”)?
Feb. 4, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Is there a way to allow the user to do away with “recent activity” that's not so recent? that has been viewed already? I'd like “recent activity” when I log on to be limited to stuff that I haven't had the opportunity to see before–at minimum, maybe a ‘date stamp’ on each entry would help?

All in all, very nice job and delighted to see that, indeed, the monkeys never rest.
Feb. 2, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
There are some system preferences left out of this problem: 2D = 4+ or 5+ (hoping 5+)? allowed to bid 3C with min two-suiter (given light opening style, probably not? with D support, who cares?)?
Jan. 29, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Oh goody, now we get to wonder about Minor-/Red-/Blackwood again….
Jan. 29, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We know what 3H is s'posed to be: inv values, 6+ H. Probably lose the same 4 tricks in 4H as in 3N, so 3N to try to collect the game bonus.
Jan. 28, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Assuming the 4N = at least 5D-4C, 5D ought to say “really good D, playable” and would seem to be the only chance to consult partner re: slam.
Jan. 25, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I prefer 2/1, but have one or two pretty vanilla Std Am partners. We do fine – not great – at IMPs on game and slam hands by using 4thSGF, splinters, J2NT. More interesting to me is that, at mps, I've found that Std Am gives us better control of the 3 level. And with weak NT partners, I really prefer the K-S 1S-2H as inv+.
Jan. 3, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Seems to me that 4S is rather wide-ranging in this auction; sometimes partner is dealt a light opener. If 4N offers slam, we can play 5H.
Jan. 3, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Henry, I'm not sure what are your concerns. Getting overboard in 7, or maybe even 6, opposite a poor min with very good Hs (Ax AKQx xxx Qxx)? With this, an similar, our auction would go 1N-3H/3N-4D/4N to play and I really, really mean it.

but if partner could only come up with this opening hand, when we held this monster, wouldn't we just fire partner for underholding?
Dec. 30, 2012
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1N-3H/4S or 1N-3H/3N, probably the latter since O doesn't know how strong R may be. Anything by R after these starts is a slam try, longer minor.

Of course, the problem is suit agreement at the 4-level, maybe not until 5m: you need some stuff to unwind it as suit agreement is often the big problem with this splinter. Consequently, I like Hall's interpretation of 4M. I'm also forming an attachment to Heitzman's minor-transfer approach when R is this strong, especially with a preaccept in place.
Dec. 30, 2012
.

Bottom Home Top