You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The OP sequence might be used (the ‘asking for Q then proceeding after a negative’ aspect of it) if 6 immediately after 5 is systemically a specific K ask?
Jan. 8, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Randy: You forced me back to the source(s). Beg to differ:

“…you need at least 14 points, not 12 points, to open with an unbalanced minor-suit hand.” The Kaplan-Sheinwold System of Winning Bridge, 1963, pg 30. A 12 count 5m-4-3-1 hand is only 13 “points.” Id.

K-S Updated:
B-8
1 m - 1 M
?
2 M Value of 15-17, high cards plus distribution, normally 4-card support, could be 3 cards (rare).

B-9
1 m - 1 M
2 M - ?
Usually 15-17, 4-card fit. Could be unbalanced equivalent. Rarely, 3-card support, too concentrated for 1 NT rebid:
♠ A Q x ♥ x x ♦ x x x ♣ A K Q x x.

B-10
1 m - 1 M
2 m
Severely limited; 12 to 14 and not 14 if good 6-card suit. Could be 5-card suit; if 6 cards, a terrible suit or a terrible hand.
Dec. 21, 2018
Scott Needham edited this comment Dec. 21, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Jeff, I'm pretty sure you'd agree that the key phrase here is “that opens the bidding.” No one playing “true” K-S would open an unbalanced 12 count with 1m, so the 3cd raise wouldn't come into play. It is a modification to open the 5m-4-3-1 12-13 counts in order to keep pace with “modern” auction standards. And IIRC, K-S allowed 1m-1M/2new-whatever/support M, bidding around the stiff, with a distributional 15-16+ dummy point hand. Trusting the K-Sers to come out of the woodwork and correct me here….
Dec. 21, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I like Wolff/Leb here, so how strong/concentrated is partner? To find out, I'd bid 1-1NT/2-2N/3-3N, showing 9-11 balanced with & stoppers. Granted, on partner's hand this could be many different holdings (xxx xx Kxxxx AQx? and similar) but isn't that what I hold?

If partner is interested in higher things, s/he can pattern out, with 4N then regressive, but I'd expect the p/o to be pure: AKQx AJTxx Axx x. If s/he does hold the perfecta, and chooses not to p/o, I can always find refuge in Hamman's Second Rule.
Dec. 18, 2018
Scott Needham edited this comment Dec. 19, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
a dumb, dastardly and distinct dereliction of directorial duty? Geez, guys, in an 11 1/2 table club game, I felt lucky to find 5. And – sorry – I'm not emailing Denver (nearest big town) players to ask.
Dec. 12, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
RR: Except that many seem to think that the factors require little weighing and/or that they would not believe me if I said “I was weighing the factors.”
Dec. 12, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I guess my point is: Doesn't E need to think about whether no games make? Seeing the actual layout makes bid, pass or double conclusions easy.
Dec. 12, 2018
Scott Needham edited this comment Dec. 12, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why not? partner doesn't know you got the nuts, and partner doesn't know opener isn't a 20 count.
Dec. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
After I do all of this self-interrogation, opps have a valid case that I used the UI during MY 30 second huddle.
Dec. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
John, is there any a priori reason N could not hold a freak like xxxx xxxxxx x xx? or xxxxx xxxxxx x x?
Dec. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
All “actively ethical” and “unethical” commenters: When faced with the BIT and looking at a hand that was always going to take a call, while explicitly acknowledging the Laws effect of the BIT: Do you think that the strategy “take the call and let the director sort it out” has any validity?
Dec. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
JL: Split – though I agree (pre-agree) that continuous range would give E a lot more to think about.
Dec. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It's always interesting to me that arguments supporting opinions on these issues show so much variation in reasoning and the possible factual scenarios that drive that reasoning.

For the record: 2 is and or . I was called immediately after the auction, and the BIT had been “pre-established,” everyone agreeing it was substantially longer than 10 seconds. Both E and W are among the most actively ethical players I know. Of the five pollees, four are or have been directors: No hiding the BIT, I'm afraid.
Dec. 11, 2018
Scott Needham edited this comment Dec. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
GB: You pays yer money….

KQJx AKQxxx x xx: 15count, 4 (conservative) LTC, looks like a reverse to me no matter what suits are represented (4cd always higher rank), even if the long suit is AKJTxx.
KQJx AKQxx xx xx not so much, but 15count, only 5 LTC.
KJTx AQxxx Kx Ax and Kxxx AKxxx x AKx: 17count, 5.5 LTC: might matter whether partner responded in the x with the second.
Helps to have K-Sish/Leb ways to be able to play in the 6carder at the 3 level.
Nov. 29, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I play the jump as invitational, but I don't like it. IMHO, Norman Kay got much the better of Peter Pender in their old TBW debate.
Nov. 5, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I must say, apart from the fact that the vote loses me \$\$, that I am surprised by these results. The subject hand is a 6 1/2 loser by conservative LTC, and 13 by K&R and Pavlicek, and that is before partner opens 1. How many respondents allow partner to open a 10 or crappy 11 count?
Nov. 4, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For me, these auctions show unbalanced hands. No alert, but an explanation before the lead.
Oct. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For some real fun, check out “Compressed Bergen.” 1M-2N = 4+ trump and 0+ HCP.
Oct. 10, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Please drop over to “You hold: Axx AJT AKx KQxx”
Sept. 24, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Please drop over to “You hold: Kxx Kxxx QJxx Ax”
Sept. 24, 2018
.

Bottom Home Top