Join Bridge Winners
Alerting ... how much information is too much information?

I have a few groups at my club that play Kennedy Openings (very similar to Montreal Relay).  It's a way to determine whether responder's major is 5 cards or not right away.

Basically, if 1 is opened, they could be short in clubs, are denying a 5+ card major, forcing.  Responder is supposed to bid their 5+ card major if they have one, 1 if they don't have a 5+ major but have at least one 4+ major, etc. etc. etc.  There's more to it, of course, but that's the gist of it.

Assume they have a convention card with everything marked out already. What exactly has to be alerted each time, and HOW MUCH EXPLANATION should they put into these alerts so they aren't UI'ing anything?  So here's a two part question I was asked last night ...

QUESTION #1

If they open 1 and alert (and opponent asks for clarification), should they say ...

Possible answer #1: "Could be short"

Possible answer #2: "Could be short in clubs, are denying a 5+ card major, forcing. Responder is supposed to bid their 5+ card major if they have one, 1 if they don't have a 5+ major but have at least one 4+ major"    (to me, this seems like way too much UI)

Possible answer #3: (other explanation)

QUESTION #2

Let's assume they give the entire speech (possible answer #2 above), even though I'm not sure what's right yet.  Do further bids that have already been explained in that first alert still have to be alerted, or is the defense expected to follow the bidding based on the first explanation?

31 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top