Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Andrzej Matuszewski

Andrzej Matuszewski
Andrzej Matuszewski
  • 30
    Following
  • 15
    Followers
  • 274
    Posts
  • 258
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
July 21, 2012
Last Seen
2 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Statistician with interests in: sociology, history, psychology, pure mathematics, ecology and MUSIC

Country
Poland

Bridge Information

Regular Bridge Partners
Jerzy Orysiak, Tadeusz Skalski, Roman Krzemien
BBO Username
mata2015
ACBL Ranking
None
subjective Standard Polish Club
Copy to my cards View/Print
Which line?
Hi Jurek! It is difficult to believe but the only way to set our contract was to underlead KQJ in clubs! In the second trick.
Which line?
Exactly!! So E has 3 spades (at the beginning).
Which line?
Next tip: W for typical take-out double "must" have 4 spades. Already showed 5 clubs. Count given by E in the first trick gives him 4 diamonds. So he heas void in hearts!
Which line?
If analyze carefully Craig we can not drop honor...
Which line?
I do not know if this is a hint or it makes problem more difficult: They had a chance to set us but they did not notice this non-trivial chance...
Which line?
Exactly (when talking about type of scoring)! We have a chance to win.
Interesting double dummy problem to work through
What was the lead?
Pairs Play Problem
First of all: You have to consider seriously winning A in the second trick.
Craig Zastera's bidding problem: T8753 A54 KQ9 97
2 has 2 shortcomings: 1. They can double us. 2. If they will play something from S's side, pd's spades lead can be bad. Nevertheless at MPs, when we need a swing 2, must be considered very seriously. Especially because their most probable contract will be ...
Steven Mcgrahan's bidding problem: KJ97 K63 K97 732
2 is bad IMHO. It says either: "I have 5 spades" or "I have minimum". Both are false.
.

Bottom Home Top