Bridge Winners Profile for Bud Hinckley
Basic Information
- Member Since
- June 30, 2010
- Last Seen
- an hour ago
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- about me
budh9534@gmail.com
ACBLscore external movements:
http://www.budhinckley.com/Movements/Bud-ACBLscore-Externals.htm
- Country
- United States of America
Bridge Information
- Regular Bridge Partners
- Richard Mao, Howard Piltch
- BBO Username
- BudH
- ACBL Ranking
- Sapphire Life Master
| Charles Clarke - Bud Hinckley 2 over 1 of a major game forcing |
Copy to my cards | View/Print |
| Richard Mao-Bud Hinckley-Howard Piltch 2 over 1 game forcing |
Copy to my cards | View/Print |
| Tim DeLaney - Bud Hinckley 2 over 1 Game Forcing |
Copy to my cards | View/Print |
| Vicki McIntire - Bud Hinckley Standard American |
Copy to my cards | View/Print |
| Richard Mao-Bud Hinckley 2 over 1 game forcing |
Copy to my cards | View/Print |
| Richard Mao-Bud Hinckley Sep2016 2 over 1 game forcing |
Copy to my cards | View/Print |
- What is the correct call?
- Absolutely. That's what Law 45C4(b) is for. Plus a bit of commonsense, also.
- What is the correct call?
- What I meant was it was likely this was the law the Director should have been using. This law was changed in 2017 adding "until he next plays a card from either his own hand or from dummy" and if it had been in use in 1999 would have made ...
- Michaels Crazy
- Being 4=5 in the majors often leads to using Michaels after a minor suit opening, with usually good results.
- What is the correct call?
- Looks like a good chance the Director may have used Law 45C4(b): Law 45C4(b): "Declarer may correct an unintended designation of a card from dummy until he next plays a card from either his own hand or from dummy. A change of designation may be allowed after a ...
- Gordon Rainsford's bidding problem: KJ542 A87 AT5 QJ
- Although I know the law and know 29% passing is enough to be a logical alternative, as East I'd feel very hard done by when 2 out of 7 polled passed (about the same percentage) - and wonder who was chosen to be polled!
- Gordon Rainsford's bidding problem: KJ542 A87 AT5 QJ
- Good point, Andy - better than partner tanking and then bidding 5♠ over my 5♥. I'm thinking 4NT, just to be able to bid 5NT and give partner a chance to bid a grand with significant extra values, is better than 5♥.
- Common game deal Wed 16 April
- It's from Wednesday afternoon the 17th.
- Gordon Rainsford's bidding problem: KJ542 A87 AT5 QJ
- 5♥. ♠AQx and ♣AKxxx in the black suits and out makes 6NT cold if there is no black suit void out there, so I find it tough to consider pass to be a logical alternative. Partner may need a heart control and nothing else and my cards look like ...
- Futile Willie?
- I'm surprised more haven't mentioned South has one of the most obvious responsive doubles ever. If a small spade was a small diamond, then pass is very reasonable.
- What would you say if you were director?
- From the "Is this AI or UI?" thread Ray linked to, what Law 50E (Information from a penalty card) means with the literal wording (or perhaps there are multiple reasonable ways to read it) would be a great example of something our laws commission should rule on - and then make ...
See all comments
