Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Craig Zastera

Craig Zastera
Craig Zastera
  • 0
    Following
  • 25
    Followers
  • 144
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
June 28, 2012
Last Seen
an hour ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Retired software engineer (Microsoft), living in Woodinville, WA.

Have played bridge since high school (starting 1965).

One national championship (Silver Ribbon Pairs) and a couple of 2nds in under 5000 national events.

Country
United States of America

Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Diamond Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Marten La Haye's bidding problem: QT954 K974 3 A85
s is hardly "their suit" since the (1) opening promised only 2 s. Many (including me) play that a direct 2 overcall of their (1) opening is natural and NF. It is also common after (1x)-P-(1Y)-2x/2y, to play both 2x and 2y as ...
John Cox's bidding problem: 85 T42 8642 AK95
I don't get the initial double at all. I'll admit that call would not even occur to me. The choice at first turn is between 3 (natural, NF) and Pass. I consider this hand to be slightly on the weak side for even 3, but might ...
Ronald Vickery's bidding problem: K954 A4 J764 AJ2
Given that I'm not going to defend (1X), the choices are a quick but blunt jump to 3NT, or starting with a double to explore alternative strains. If I double first, I likely will have to cue-bid next round as that is the only way to GF after ...
Richard Granville's bidding problem: J64 4 AJ42 Q7432
I chose pass, so the meanings of 2NT vs. 3 are not critical this time. But FWIW, I play "good/bad 2NT" on this auction, so 3 would show values while 2NT would be a "bad" hand (necessarily with s on this exact auction since other suits could ...
Jeff Ford's bidding problem: QT J 962 AKQJ764
But does it show this good a *hand*? Although many methods and agreements are possible, one reasonable set might include: redouble followed by jump to 3 shows an invitational hand with a good long suit, e.g.: xx-xx-xxx-AKQJxx Certainly, it would be good to have some way to ...
Jeff Ford's bidding problem: QT J 962 AKQJ764
No inconsistencies because I believe he is talking about 2 after first re-doubling. Forcing. But 2 directly over 1-(DBL) is not forcing.
Jack Campbell's bidding problem: T8743 J97 Q5 AKQ
This hand is a very marginal opener in 1st/2nd seat. Depends on partnership style. It does count to 22, but has a "weak quack" in each red suit. Therefore, I would not open in 1st/2nd, but I suspect many/most would. In 3rd or 4th chair, though, I ...
Bill Segraves's bidding problem: KJT8754 A6 5 QJ6
But if we can't, I may not be there at all.
Marten La Haye's bidding problem: QT954 K974 3 A85
Even after agreeing that partner's 2 is natural (and NF), this advancing hand is not easy to bid. Suppose, even, that partner had opened 1 and we had the auction 1-1-2-? without competition. It would not be clear how responder should continue. On *that ...
Bill Segraves's bidding problem: KJT8754 A6 5 QJ6
The main consideration in deciding whether to pre-empt vs. overcall 1 is whether our side can have a game. Here, the answer is obviously "yes"--we could easily have a game. Axx-xxx-xxxx-Kxx for example would be enough for 4 to be excellent and that is far from an ...
Not following anyone yet
.

Bottom Home Top