Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Dave Kresh

Dave Kresh
Dave Kresh
  • 50
    Following
  • 14
    Followers
  • 24
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
May 14, 2015
Last Seen
16 minutes ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Retired business/engineering systems analyst. Frequent online (OKB), occasional club and local tourney player. Avid interest in bidding systems and bidding theory. Developer - Naturelle bidding system. Approximately 600 MPs as of 2015, but with tentative power rating (per Colorado Springs) of over 11000 MPs.  This must be due to my bidding rather than declarer play or defense. Willing to share Naturelle with anyone interested in learning or playing. Would love to see the system used by better players than myself, which means most anyone on Bridgewinners ;-).

Country
United States of America

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
Meeting my favorite partner (life/bridge) at our Regional 24 years ago, marrying her a year later.
Bridge Accomplishments
1) Winning 2-session Stratified Open Pairs at Pittsburgh Sectional in 1991. We had about 200 MPs total, the field included almost a dozen Top 500 players. 2) Played lifetime in only three Open National events (Pittsburgh), nearly qualifying for Jacoby Swiss day 2. 5th in the A/X pairs after 1 session (just behind Zeke Jabbour, but ahead of some other well-knowns (scrounging my only Platinum Point out of the 2nd session)
Regular Bridge Partners
Andrew Petrick, Bob Kleinmann, Mitchell Model, Bruce Karlan, and Cathi Kresh. Formerly, Steve Nolan
Favorite Tournaments
Cross Creek Sectional (7 Cities), anything in a 2-hour radius of Pittsburgh. Also Gatlinburg - a great Regional
Favorite Conventions
Weak NT, Intermediate 2 Bids, 2-Way Stayman, and natural doubles and redoubles. Also 2-Way Minisplinters, and short suit game/slam tries.
BBO Username
BBO username - dkresh; OKB username - kresh
ACBL Ranking
Bronze Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
What is 1!C - (1!S) - 2!S?
... then they are not playing with a full deck ...
Dave Kresh's bidding problem: Q965 --- 932 QT7532
1= 15+ and 3+s; or 11+ and 6+S (no singleton or void).
Bake Yourself a Multi Defence
Tom, this looks reasonable to me. I do wonder if we want to get into the auction immediately with 4333 and 13-14. Partner will probably act in 4th seat when we do.
Bake Yourself a Multi Defence
Yes Bill, 3 is the qbid. For both natural and artificial openings or combinations thereof. With 12 HCP and diamonds, I am not adverse to treating a weaker hand as equivalent with 6+ diamonds or 5+diamonds and any singleton or void. Alternatively, If partner doesn't care for ...
Bake Yourself a Multi Defence
Right, David. After (2) - X, we both have time and space to act. I have shown a strong hand with some diamonds; they have shown a weak hand with an unknown major. My partner is already better placed than opener's. So far, I like our position better than ...
Bake Yourself a Multi Defence
the suit bid.
Bake Yourself a Multi Defence
Our generic defense for 2+level openings below game: X = 15+, 3+cards in bid suit Overcall = natural, 5+cards, 5-6 losers NT = takeout, 5-6 losers (2 or 3 non-bid suits) Qbid = any, 0-4 losers I don't see a need to for us to customize this versus Multi. The ...
Why is the accepted point range for bidding as it is?
IMO = in my opinion (not so sure if I am humble...so I drop the "H") ;-).
Board 9, 22 January
This hand is interesting, but the previous post really got my attention ;)
Why is the accepted point range for bidding as it is?
IMO, openings should show a little more than average - thus 11 HCP. If partner has an average hand, you have a decent chance to make more than average tricks (7 out of 13). Catering to the very common 8-10 range is useful, but IMO best handled outside of your constructive ...
.

Bottom Home Top