Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for David Coles

David Coles
David Coles
  • 105
  • 7
  • 50
  • 0

Basic Information

Member Since
April 16, 2011
Last Seen
22 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player

Bridge Information

Member of Bridge Club(s)
Tampa Bay Bridge Center
ACBL Ranking
Gold Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Steve Valencic's bidding problem: AJ AKT75 KT74 KT
What does 4 accomplish? You have the hand that needs to take control. If partner bids 5 you have no idea if you belong in 5, 6, or 7. 4NT should b kcb for .
Phil Clayton's bidding problem: AKQT32 J4 AT3 J3
Todd Holes's bidding problem: AK3 Q964 QJ8763 ---
4NT asking the same thing
Craig Biddle's bidding problem: KQ JT76532 4 Q83
Pass. Too many flaws for anything else
Mark Jones's bidding problem: A87 6 AKQ987 A75
I like 2. If partner raises he should have 5 spades. If not you get more info than you would with a jump to 3
Rodney Lighton's bidding problem: AJ92 QJ9 K4 A865
How can 4 be non-minimum when you slready bid 2 minimum spades?
The weakness of lower strats
I was at a game a few months ago where the director was having the usual ns-ew difficulties. He finally announced that if he didn’t get a ns to volunteer to switch, we would play the game with two sitouts. Surprise! A pair volunteered. Brilliant!
You be the director
As reference, partner is a notorious weak weak-2er, frequently with 5. We use mod-Ogust to compensate. I probably was too conservative here, but it was a conditioned
The weakness of lower strats
Missing the point I think
The weakness of lower strats
I’m with Peg...makes my head explode. This is supposed to be a competitive game. Why reward the worst pair in a field. Are we doing participation awards like T-ball? Goes against my grain is all.

Bottom Home Top