Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Frances Hinden

Frances Hinden
Frances Hinden
  • 0
    Following
  • 154
    Followers
  • 101
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
May 27, 2014
Last Seen
34 minutes ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

I'm based near London, England and fit as much bridge as I can round my day job working in corporate treasury. I'm also vice-chairman of the EBU Laws & Ethics Committee. I play a complex system but find defence and declarer play more interesting than 'assign the blame' bidding problems.

Country
United Kingdom

Bridge Information

Bridge Accomplishments
Twice winner of the British Gold Cup and the Camrose, won the English Premier League and the Spring Foursomes. I sometimes play on the English Open team and reached the QF of the 2016 Olympiad
Regular Bridge Partners
Graham Osborne, Jeffrey Allerton
Member of Bridge Club(s)
Wimbledon
BBO Username
Finch
ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Am I Old Fashioned?
That's a different auction. I think everyone agrees that in 1970s Acol, rebidding your own suit after a 2NT rebid was non-forcing. Some still play that. The OP is about bidding opener's suit. I'm still not entirely sure why we're having a debate about what was ...
Meaning of 1m-1!s; 1NT-2!h
Generally invitations don't exist without conventional help. The principle is that opener has limited their hand, so you don't need a further invitation. Just like in response to a 1NT opening bid: 2 of a major is a sign-off, 3 is a game force. I bid 3 ...
Responding 2!c with exactly 4!s +4!c GF?
I've played various different schemes, all of which work reasonably well (one of them being copyright Mike Bell, I admit) The general theme is that you make 1NT either forcing or virtually forcing and put multiple hand types in it. a) 1NT rebid is diamonds, weak NT or good-but-not-FG ...
non-forcing stayman
I suspect the answer to your question is yes, or virtually.
Am I Old Fashioned?
Aha! You are quoting the wrong bit of All About Acol. On page 135 of my copy of the 1978 fourth edition, under "Other Forcing Responder's Rebids" it says: When opener's rebid has been 2NT, responder's return to his partner's suit at the three-level is unconditionally ...
Am I Old Fashioned?
If we're quoting books written in the 1970s to justify an opinion in 2020, I'll go with The Complete Book of Bridge by Reese and Dormer from 1973: "...any suit bid by responder now will be forcing, except for a simple rebid in his own suit" As we ...
Responding 2!c with exactly 4!s +4!c GF?
The advantage of responding 1 is that opener will limit their hand with their rebid. The problem is that responder has no easy way of showing a game forcing hand. David Burn points out that if opener likes to raise 1 to 2 on a 3-card suit ...
Nice hand for planning play - intermediate level
Not on this hand, where you would have to play a second spade to dummy to play a heart up.
Nice hand for planning play - intermediate level
A singleton can still be a good lead even if the opponents are known to have all the key cards. It can disrupt communication or cause declarer not to take a safety play because they may run into a ruff.
Do they always pitch first from their 5 card suit?
What's the advantage of this? We play after the 3 puppet (which opener is allowed to break) step 1 balanced, 3NT spade shortage and 4m 'natural' i.e. shortage in that suit. With spades trumps, we just bid the shortage. The disadvantage of the artificial route is that ...
Not following anyone yet
.

Bottom Home Top