Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Gábor Szőts

Gábor Szőts
Gábor Szőts
  • 7
    Following
  • 14
    Followers
  • 122
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
April 9, 2012
Last Seen
13 hours ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

Former electrical engineer (power system protection). Now resigned from work.

Used to play competitive chess, now active in computer chess testing. Fond of music, reading, various sports, games of logic.

Started to play bridge in 1974. Won my first major tournament in 1980.

More interested in bidding than in card play.

I used to be a regular commentator at BBO.

 

Country
Hungary

Bridge Information

Bridge Accomplishments
Hungarian teams champion in 2011 and 2012, Hungarian IMP pairs champion in 2014. Once I executed an entry-shifting squeeze at the table.
Favorite Tournaments
Pula Bridge Festival
Favorite Conventions
1m-2m-2H showing a balanced hand
BBO Username
cicus
ACBL Ranking
None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Gazzilli doubt
I thought the real problem would be a weak balanced hand. That's why I think forcing NT and Gazzilli cannot be played together.
When you play xyz
Very interesting ideas here. Thanks all for sharing them.
Do you play your 2!D opening as a weak 2?
Thanks everybody for your opinions and suggestions. Much appreciated.
Do you play your 2!D opening as a weak 2?
Hungarian first division.
Do you play your 2!D opening as a weak 2?
Michael: He swears under his nose. What I would probably do is transfer to spades, pass and hope. As far as I know the Italians also do not have a solution to that. But you must know that better than me.
Do you play your 2!D opening as a weak 2?
I have not thought about details yet.
Do you play your 2!D opening as a weak 2?
Here is a simple response structure, using only 5 bids: - 2: 4+, no 4+ - 2: puppet to 2NT, denies 4+. Continuations as over a 2NT opening, taking into consideration that responder cannot have 4+. - 2NT: balanced slam try - 3: 4-4 in the majors ...
Do you play your 2!D opening as a weak 2?
"Alternatively play 2♦ as 18-19 NT and put the weak 2♦ into the 2♣ opening" Yes, that is something I am considering too.
Apportion the blame - no play slam
Thanks for all those responses and discussion. For the record, I was East. These were my thoughts: With a distributional hand I would have bid something over 3, so my pass over 3 must be a (semi)balanced hand. When partner passed over 4 I thought he ...
Liam Milne's bidding problem: AKT953 K8 AT74 3
3. Then 4 over 3, 4 over 3NT or 4, 5 over 4.
.

Bottom Home Top